All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	hch@lst.de, JBottomley@parallels.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Venkatesh Srinivas <vsrinivas@ops101.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] virtio-scsi: fix various bad behavior on aborted requests
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:29:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHdzE-8KoMrg_jSuj-F9c=HnapCiLCg9bKCifduTaxx-DAJZRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401881699-1456-6-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On 6/4/14, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> Even though the virtio-scsi spec guarantees that all requests related
> to the TMF will have been completed by the time the TMF itself completes,
> the request queue's callback might not have run yet.  This causes requests
> to be completed more than once, and as a result triggers a variety of
> BUGs or oopses.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> index d66c4ee2c774..fda9fb358888 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,16 @@ static void virtscsi_req_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
>  	virtscsi_vq_done(vscsi, req_vq, virtscsi_complete_cmd);
>  };
>
> +static void virtscsi_poll_requests(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi)
> +{
> +	int i, num_vqs;
> +
> +	num_vqs = vscsi->num_queues;
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++)
> +		virtscsi_vq_done(vscsi, &vscsi->req_vqs[i],
> +				 virtscsi_complete_cmd);
> +}
> +
>  static void virtscsi_complete_free(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi, void *buf)
>  {
>  	struct virtio_scsi_cmd *cmd = buf;
> @@ -579,6 +589,18 @@ static int virtscsi_tmf(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi,
> struct virtio_scsi_cmd *cmd)
>  	    cmd->resp.tmf.response == VIRTIO_SCSI_S_FUNCTION_SUCCEEDED)
>  		ret = SUCCESS;
>
> +	/*
> +	 * The spec guarantees that all requests related to the TMF have
> +	 * been completed, but the callback might not have run yet if
> +	 * we're using independent interrupts (e.g. MSI).  Poll the
> +	 * virtqueues once.
> +	 *
> +	 * In the abort case, sc->scsi_done will do nothing, because
> +	 * the block layer must have detected a timeout and as a result
> +	 * REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE has been set.
> +	 */
> +	virtscsi_poll_requests(vscsi);

Do you really want to poll the request VQs for completions if the TMF
was rejected?

TMF ABORT may return FUNCTION REJECTED if the command to abort
completed before the device saw the TMF ABORT message, for example. In
such cases, this would
unnecessarily lengthen the EH path.

> +
>  out:
>  	mempool_free(cmd, virtscsi_cmd_pool);
>  	return ret;
> --
> 1.8.3.1

Thanks for looking into this,
-- vs;

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-04 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-04 11:34 [PATCH v3 0/6] virtio-scsi patches for 3.16 + midlayer fix Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-04 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] virtio_scsi: remove ACCESS_ONCE() and smp_read_barrier_depends() Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-05 10:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-04 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] virtio-scsi: replace target spinlock with seqcount Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-04 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] virtio-scsi: avoid cancelling uninitialized work items Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-05 10:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-11 12:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-11 13:19     ` Fwd: " Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-06-04 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] scsi_error: fix invalid setting of host byte Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-05 10:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-04 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] virtio-scsi: fix various bad behavior on aborted requests Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-04 17:29   ` Venkatesh Srinivas [this message]
2014-06-04 19:05     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-05  3:10       ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2014-06-04 11:34 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] virtio-scsi: Implement change_queue_depth for virtscsi targets Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHdzE-8KoMrg_jSuj-F9c=HnapCiLCg9bKCifduTaxx-DAJZRw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=venkateshs@google.com \
    --cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vsrinivas@ops101.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.