From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EE9C2BBCA for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 21:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297502396D for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 21:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727531AbgLGV1F (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:27:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48786 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726492AbgLGV1E (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:27:04 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb41.google.com (mail-yb1-xb41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE725C0619D2; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:23:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb41.google.com with SMTP id j17so6097348ybt.9; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:23:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EJOHc17zvEobDOFxwlnd1L4iMrQot9jcPwqhnGntr9I=; b=PR89FjhyROMYrzNdU/CC1sy61GlJsq1xPP9zXtszWtlNZ1p9hqWSvP2SAeHJOYSl+r nrK2vOZakMjvi20D89GE3y+afmrxePMvpvVuVzav3DjsiGaClZ6l3yvxfuXm7SO3vq7m 9PYtA7ZXzMj4Kn2AyiQIdC/rHf3Fnot0r9Ao05CEhVJneTKf8OxQsc7AXdyXdlCEfgiJ utkc38Yit/vo2z7dOgwMtN8EuNG2hfZPE4G4i3EJXcicSD1P53NayKTisC8ahbsqrxzw DhZw5pZLZxEgcqC5CTvR38f/EGBvBTC28qk8a4ro4Ld+r4+WCFDFWQJberhAK2FTaabZ e+Uw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EJOHc17zvEobDOFxwlnd1L4iMrQot9jcPwqhnGntr9I=; b=El6XLlwdlX+G7iQU9o5gc9wD4w1Am8LuIf1klHXjxiKpYojIQIDMe+4RZDQ0SS/jbw tHFP+dDir8zB4Tu9unGUisV+YEoW79vBJH/CQ3YJwSRCT4DY6irP+xUElS+IyATSpioX UID19Ou6nXTKj7nrwMEkgOh4JMBHuNvJrqCUanSY2eCrrkWf9BMzHgdMUvLQ9xL2Fp+j uT2n778dgdHpTEc2lh+XRldPXWlcS009osfe7vovCMnRad+iXkSZRuRQVZcZ4rE6c+Pm D7iOyejl53TfO4vKB/kcRS5WaLNyF2D9e56VJsg8GFBJ9jEfFc0RXki6jlQssttRjW0h vRHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FbuVHS8F+2TbMozVKRRuTq9dIGzQlHT9rQrU/jHbKnLW7GILu wrdtgKR69WcHthNV8VQq1NNuW3EYbQiYqhAepTfw56Sj X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5qZ+rLue5yDZ0J7fW53DlyRNWKSX802X7XAN4N0j77LPTesms57jetylejWawrq8UlQ0Y7Omr67EaQhDYMHk= X-Received: by 2002:a25:cad2:: with SMTP id a201mr25315070ybg.327.1607376232060; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:23:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201027204226.26906-1-pboris@amazon.com> In-Reply-To: From: Boris Protopopov Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:23:41 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for getting and setting SACLs To: Pavel Shilovsky Cc: Shyam Prasad N , Boris Protopopov , Steve French , linux-cifs , samba-technical , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org HI, Pavel, yes, thanks for the pointer, will include in the future. Boris. On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:05 PM Pavel Shilovsky wrote: > > Hi Boris, > > Are you talking about this patch "[PATCH] Extend cifs acl utilities to > handle SACLs"? > > Just for the future, I am trying to monitor the samba-dev mailing list > but if you would like to get the fastest response to your patches then > please include me directly or at least the linux-cifs mailing list. > > I stage pending patches in the "next" branch on my github tree, so, > will include the one above. > > https://github.com/piastry/cifs-utils/commits/next > > -- > Best regards, > Pavel Shilovsky > > =D0=BF=D0=BD, 7 =D0=B4=D0=B5=D0=BA. 2020 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 07:28, Boris Prot= opopov : > > > > Hello, Shyam, > > > > sorry for the delayed reply and thanks for looking at this patch. Yes, > > the testing was done using the extended versions of > > getcifsacl/setcifsacl (added setting owner and SACL support), the > > patch for that posted recently via samba-technical (message ID > > <20201120214918.12517-1-pboris@amazon.com>). I have tested > > setting/getting the owner, DACL, and SACL, for all the DACL/SACL flags > > (-a, -D, -M, -S), SACL type SYSTEM_AUDIT. This testing was done > > against 5.10.0-rc1 and 4.14.203 (the latter required porting the > > user-space patch). I believe this testing has fully exercised the code > > changes in question. > > > > I will look at contributing to the fsxtesting-cifs code, but I think > > the setcifsacl/getcifsact patch that enables easy access to the > > descriptor components is a pre-requisite for such contributions. > > > > Thanks! > > > >