From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD64C0044C for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 22:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71CF204FD for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 22:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="NMnHts3k" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A71CF204FD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728058AbeKBHM1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2018 03:12:27 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com ([209.85.208.194]:47075 "EHLO mail-lj1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727412AbeKBHM1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2018 03:12:27 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id x3-v6so19464262lji.13 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 15:07:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dZkIkymw17XE3cqn53DMJkvZ47QXl3j9f8ocvL8XoAc=; b=NMnHts3k/sBoKSN2U20EWKkFVumIMMCc0807xeoG/kbx04C5mqyZK4MZtxQkmnsMaP kq74Y4T7Jn0/hMWcVNtHP8VV7RztFLQkPsCXFZNDllbVscBDuAw7uyXXFuKQWBgB71KV 00h6YjmoRIkRSzOGLoRK30QgQrcsJmhI8jl3E= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dZkIkymw17XE3cqn53DMJkvZ47QXl3j9f8ocvL8XoAc=; b=KkCRvTEijPzJNkXsxp64O7VbyZIx+n6Rwmvz3yzrDkwLAXzDXJPeiMXBLYUtCN76WB J0ixaNb/3zTtqRC73l05xtbbtzJeuQrAK3g01yJfA8PmTpMRLTu7iylYSki1UkBS7Etd 5zLIX1Yz5tDF9ovdCzotrW9Ym7ApMfc/cz7kmStanH3Bicol0EvUNXBwrcnpWFvXkgIq m8K4xFY1o5oVsYieDgAtw1pBe+i7ZoJ3MtUJGDUxg/DEZlAqwgTf9BS0FU3UVeVCoig1 M/UkvlGOTKWgCVza9W88Oi0LOu7CuLgL4xCxQ0TM0no+DCgV+d2NAIjm6Dp9kD0jceHL zElA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLgzN+YarDCr/kid7T4lILpsKcqtagGD7iZIDKS8uqS9iCyuJfS wjwsolKKrMz4RpDUTZrceSkDha3dYtJUmA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cAuX8D0FYkMEXAYPAfq9IXq2QCs5dZ4MhaBnFlJLBpZXDqAE0T7IfLzspCfBhtmeuShyZv0Q== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2a46:: with SMTP id q67-v6mr3106573ljq.38.1541110054622; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 15:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f175.google.com (mail-lj1-f175.google.com. [209.85.208.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b79-v6sm3514127lfb.40.2018.11.01.15.07.33 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Nov 2018 15:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f175.google.com with SMTP id t22-v6so2011lji.7 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 15:07:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3e06:: with SMTP id l6-v6mr2830900lja.148.1541110052845; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 15:07:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181031053355.GQ32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <28156.1541092687@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20181101220518.GT32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20181101220518.GT32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:07:17 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [git pull] mount API series To: Al Viro Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, swhiteho@redhat.com, john.johansen@canonical.com, alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com, ebiederm@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:05 PM Al Viro wrote: > > Do you mind if we end up with work.mount rebased? > The usual objections re testing in -next do not apply in this case, > AFAICS... I was assuming that the work.mount branch would be entirely re-done, yes. Linus