All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	wangzhigang17@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: reuse the unshared swapcache page in do_wp_page
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 10:55:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg-FvLd9Vyg1+n47gDSSDmHJnjmW0-FaQGJcbrtgbYALg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c44a89d-06a7-d0bb-e71e-7947d651f4d1@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 9:55 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> However, reuse_swap_page() currently does multiple things, and that's part of the issue.

Yeah, I think it's a horrible function. The COW path was explicitly
changed not to use it because it's so confusing.

> While we're at it, is there a real reason we can't simplify to
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index e8e2144cbfa6..ab114a5862a0 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3295,7 +3295,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> -               if (PageKsm(page) || page_mapcount(page) != 1 || page_count(page) != 1) {
> +               if (PageKsm(page) || page_count(page) != 1) {

No, I think both the mapcount and the ksm check are bogus and should
be removed, but they are both examples of "get rid of the nastiest
complexity, leave the stuff that doesn't much matter".

Somebody who really knows the ksm logic should check all the ksm
tests. I really think they are pointless, and came from the old and
horribly broken page_mapcount() logic that did *not* check
page_count().

When you think page_mapcount() matters, suddenly you have to worry
about all the other non-mapping uses of a page, which is why I think
that ksm test still exists. But I didn't mind keeping a couple of
extraneous tests that I didn't see the point of , as long as the core
page-count-based logfc was solid

          Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-13 14:03 [PATCH] mm: reuse the unshared swapcache page in do_wp_page Liang Zhang
2022-01-13 14:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-13 14:46   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 15:02     ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-13 15:04       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 16:37   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-13 16:48     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 17:14       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-13 17:25         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 17:44           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-13 17:55             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 18:55               ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2022-01-13 21:07             ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-13 22:21               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-14  5:00       ` zhangliang (AG)
2022-01-14 11:23         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-17  2:11           ` zhangliang (AG)
2022-01-17 12:58             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-17 13:31               ` zhangliang (AG)
2022-01-20 14:15                 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 14:39                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-20 15:26                     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 15:36                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-20 15:39                         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 15:45                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-20 15:51                             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 16:09                               ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-20 16:35                                 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 15:37                       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-20 15:46                         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 17:22                           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-20 17:49                             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 17:48                   ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-20 18:00                     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 18:11                       ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-20 18:19                         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 19:55                         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 20:07                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-20 20:09                             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 20:37                               ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 20:46                                 ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-20 20:49                                   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-21  9:01                                     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-21 17:43                                       ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-20 20:18                           ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-14  3:29   ` zhangliang (AG)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wg-FvLd9Vyg1+n47gDSSDmHJnjmW0-FaQGJcbrtgbYALg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=wangzhigang17@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zhangliang5@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.