From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326F4C2BB85 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 18:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F297120771 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 18:07:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586455633; bh=QULdvA/Sx7XJffozT5xBSNPgMYS/3DHKQe3XK/EIo/M=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=NBV9ED/nqYsNtJZhmHHO5xtH42jYrarq3Egmy2YBQzHFtgFb7Lx6kKX8tlo+I+eet YZArElOiREcag3+LftAH6FOS+3YEKp3AC7eaB6boukVwr1M1A7E0R4tZyi2QoK/zh+ a6IfRZTOTgurb5PIYb5CVImso+1TPyFfLyUlOSyM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726582AbgDISHL (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:07:11 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com ([209.85.167.68]:42664 "EHLO mail-lf1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725970AbgDISHL (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:07:11 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id s13so329870lfb.9 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:07:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NBrUWLbZwr5SPpF8gJ16K43we21bAOTnDyWHWq5miJs=; b=aaY6eRayHYXc5ivMpYlFmsawWScyEu3k6ckAQ+QjIy+NIuWi+LeSCgizJqFpMmToai Jhmf9IO/IwprrefYTpdiUzczZOcCXrHY59ukIhp81/uB02G7RHhQsGjm+qudSTlTCvOB v98ctkuStOhNsPewVW9H2toALB5uGk3CWVnZ8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NBrUWLbZwr5SPpF8gJ16K43we21bAOTnDyWHWq5miJs=; b=Bi9vI5XmbqietDiofEFLDxt+jLwyLsLGs2Vr+BxXfBQe86gbB9+W0ZfDj2DHMgCwOm MSACApdomUnEAVwMmWyg4dte8VJX6fgyKDmm0ZCczGXjNfZw59aBSKxJi8UGn7bKqV1V GLmPNTd1CWe5jhHZi6YZy4A+K7EHoKvmzOwZKSnvyIBfkJjmnsn+fXQ34UwjXkaAeyOJ 9D09VBNEMPSy3YOfP7/HtYqNAbI9a2d5rb+dZzoL1QOVSauOfoVBO09IwMFz58bmY5K6 5PtbTI1+Aa2SI/S0BG7kUzlzfKV4NWPsa00Zn6HHzzFuydN+3cJ6H13w5JpBO1QbbZM1 X7sg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZL6QaziV88TAE8ArVTNEerIf4qGy9Z73PM0XXre5Uumc3EpjbV XS6ngzsWmr5gzfTmTBysLvcss86SLI4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIugMgvVxdhw1Swna/YyfzjIo7M/0T8Ryro/IDYNgZ1RdkS1XLXkuIYHXlUD4w0KakKBljMqQ== X-Received: by 2002:a19:4843:: with SMTP id v64mr293793lfa.155.1586455628996; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f171.google.com (mail-lj1-f171.google.com. [209.85.208.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o17sm4885182lff.70.2020.04.09.11.07.07 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f171.google.com with SMTP id m8so688030lji.1 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:07:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7c1a:: with SMTP id x26mr581750ljc.209.1586455627334; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:07:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 11:06:51 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports To: Qian Cai Cc: Dmitry Vyukov , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , Peter Xu , LKML , Linux-MM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:58 AM Qian Cai wrote: > > Agree to make a big deal part. My point is that when kicking trees of linux-next, it also could reduce the exposure of many patches (which could be bad) to linux-next and miss valuable early testing either from robots or human. Sure. But I'd want to be notified when something gets kicked out, so that I then know not to pull it. So it would reduce the exposure of patches, but it would also make sure those patches then don't make it upstream. Untested patches is fine - as long as nobody else has to suffer through them. Linus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1C7C2BA19 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 18:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE74220757 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 18:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="aaY6eRay" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AE74220757 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 3134B8E0006; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:07:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2C4098E0003; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:07:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1D9E68E0006; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:07:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0151.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.151]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEEF8E0003 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:07:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29E199B4 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 18:07:11 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76689098262.22.shirt62_5be2593385229 X-HE-Tag: shirt62_5be2593385229 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3923 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com (mail-lj1-f196.google.com [209.85.208.196]) by imf42.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 18:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id m8so688172lji.1 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:07:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NBrUWLbZwr5SPpF8gJ16K43we21bAOTnDyWHWq5miJs=; b=aaY6eRayHYXc5ivMpYlFmsawWScyEu3k6ckAQ+QjIy+NIuWi+LeSCgizJqFpMmToai Jhmf9IO/IwprrefYTpdiUzczZOcCXrHY59ukIhp81/uB02G7RHhQsGjm+qudSTlTCvOB v98ctkuStOhNsPewVW9H2toALB5uGk3CWVnZ8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NBrUWLbZwr5SPpF8gJ16K43we21bAOTnDyWHWq5miJs=; b=DDVRaVhPs8oLvI3Zwm44zpaQinleqslv2cUsd7aaB4aHV+oTml68kiO2QYd0OJCYsc U4S6BP6UjS1WmtS35/CaOX8ueqGHPpAABxepigYLx+wnxbA49oNFZumueYirLi8DTcW7 r35ykxKmFh25LOQUkH1EDgrVGvEVq/WlIMpja/cmCRg7eUOMlvepIhD3RVzB+e2X+YDC t2a6P0Z+S3GdWroRpt3mFbIqLs6vI/pDcEqkB8bdpZlq5s92fcb+K8uziP1o99pK5Qx6 8iFiTIPGuFw8efhAQYKUorADWQh7210y9QmvhTACsj/D0xcoyPIO1t1SvlJN2v9xCbkf W3FA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ8WjQVbXLbqP7e0apmTvtgbg6/48otGLv0wmBvMLHZDzYQkta+ HmqypriE1N6Hc25RRrz19peXwid28cM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL/fFMaDfgVMi2AuIibgWw+7txxcKdNm8a+CYWMaCoJ4ZLjuEf7uEYRujWdoagDJ+d7HQ3wtg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9a05:: with SMTP id o5mr671152lji.45.1586455628959; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f181.google.com (mail-lj1-f181.google.com. [209.85.208.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o195sm5272659lfa.50.2020.04.09.11.07.07 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f181.google.com with SMTP id k21so684570ljh.2 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:07:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7c1a:: with SMTP id x26mr581750ljc.209.1586455627334; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 11:07:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 11:06:51 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports To: Qian Cai Cc: Dmitry Vyukov , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , Peter Xu , LKML , Linux-MM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:58 AM Qian Cai wrote: > > Agree to make a big deal part. My point is that when kicking trees of linux-next, it also could reduce the exposure of many patches (which could be bad) to linux-next and miss valuable early testing either from robots or human. Sure. But I'd want to be notified when something gets kicked out, so that I then know not to pull it. So it would reduce the exposure of patches, but it would also make sure those patches then don't make it upstream. Untested patches is fine - as long as nobody else has to suffer through them. Linus