From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DBBC04AAF for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 18:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C3E20833 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 18:43:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1558032202; bh=rdmSNUy/n5TWTgBsZs5YjiSbaOAojzGIidFrDTyi6dM=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=B48tJ8EhjSgOYtnLU4TxCVu5PczouRZaWMek3yz9GwGk1rOmvjKL6FBTWpJQDFv5E acvIB6q/jtPFKAxpMcfHSqluwcjYFY5Fb32QRY5jw7ThhiME05kCi+9TidvklkZhgi VUw+YDL9H0nJJh4oJtV/N4eTAN9aJxj7kMc/MFF8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727875AbfEPSnV (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 14:43:21 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f180.google.com ([209.85.208.180]:33734 "EHLO mail-lj1-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727000AbfEPSnR (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 14:43:17 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f180.google.com with SMTP id w1so4084689ljw.0 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 11:43:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7cZ1i1PlSN05rjwgmeSPBOyRXDYpMKnhLwTSuPaFE/U=; b=EfMguayduqZ24ff/F2BHhhOzDjdyonEf/8VAfENfIiKBoB1yeFBf4g99m6HV/ITW75 ljiBLFVvQ2AmeClpItH1kbP5DUhFgHjF3hBfb0bAa+H9/32UpRA/gA93SgH3F+wg+0iD Q4TO8Dsk7hrNYV0eWnI/r80xmPZC2tINDBImE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7cZ1i1PlSN05rjwgmeSPBOyRXDYpMKnhLwTSuPaFE/U=; b=Ipl1GMcQejQG1fsD96xR5r/gyX7W+S/avTCluc9vsT5A0mo/Wyh0w0Uzt1c8Wby+HM bRA9qOL5NyEsHG3YvMgyeXMkVw6jaCwhWIn0xjce8h221Ssl6cNjdHtkPgHRDyDFuL3a F+cobg0mSg+zhyTTXKbT4AAEBu8XKpkGGaF5yBARwW/04wtaQTkyxOSVsN1LY/7D+KOE HDpREcvGQxG9Qo9ac79bLx18u+7S8BTGycphKAyIJobGNQT4utqxHvqBpsXFbYayM5Pz qzVy74oaeMYIYN2tKRUeLRw7SiarnrE0ikx2qlJbVkkD351NQ73wXY/Du+z/+c+NAG94 Q6AQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUKorwP4lOV6Vn++EMCqaAb4T6EUlVOI5ioP2GVYfIIHTX7bBH3 kf+uhvcsEISWGoJRNWKsGlD7Naqx5mA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzNs9NfA66QniJh4DcChpaqTaHtBbOXXYh5pk9XKH5y/2jNv6xL8yOPXHd2BKKiJBV9CoISkg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:824b:: with SMTP id j11mr24408315ljh.197.1558032195176; Thu, 16 May 2019 11:43:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com. [209.85.167.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n18sm1181679lji.63.2019.05.16.11.43.14 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 May 2019 11:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id l26so3391496lfh.13 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 11:43:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a19:5015:: with SMTP id e21mr25981649lfb.62.1558032194090; Thu, 16 May 2019 11:43:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190516160135.GA45760@gmail.com> <20190516183945.GA6659@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20190516183945.GA6659@kroah.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 11:42:58 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] locking fix To: Greg KH Cc: Ingo Molnar , stable , Linux List Kernel Mailing , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 11:39 AM Greg KH wrote: > > Thanks, I'll work on that later tonight... Note that it probably is almost entirely impossible to trigger the problem in practice, so it's not like this is a particularly important stable back-port. I just happened to look at it and go "hmm, it's not _marked_ for stable". Linus