From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67697C4724C for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 00:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39288207DD for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 00:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="AvUgqN7P" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 39288207DD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03106111FC1E7; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::142; helo=mail-lf1-x142.google.com; envelope-from=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org; receiver= Received: from mail-lf1-x142.google.com (mail-lf1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::142]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AFC810113FCE for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x142.google.com with SMTP id z22so2636353lfd.0 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:40:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sRFJfZwHnsJQqFJepe+LvPqS40H3J51FnSnbFsYaAJM=; b=AvUgqN7PB/2m6j6r3ChFqht9nBGFMbV8AKa9u30SyVlVrTUy+Tv1TOIg+df2atuDm9 mrQr9/kg7XzvTBlUGO0QByBQRaSsjKRXNdddPP7Y9Z8zjn9Nh1TKQSTFhhdcbHFIGZAm 23fUYndzjvvhniZu8dhlkJL4EDHoYqfSv1iW0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sRFJfZwHnsJQqFJepe+LvPqS40H3J51FnSnbFsYaAJM=; b=jmeeiVXa5h3mbYcbYqZpx5m7lRQSgFs3/7ByaMW8S8h15UgwGUWuTYvxWpPb0UhO1o SAniZrWz4EL0i7iZA/WGY5fWbcZQ5+fon+btYSGVNqyjxy3O5gFlOASakxArLSL/sAq4 diiLYBqrLlRbtuugl/Chi42Mvb5eOp6ZrkxF74dGOhWYbcdk1XunuxvtJHQhFo314aTN mIyqrent4LFxENys7GDuYs/tgi75hXp4j0vDQL1lO07YEiMhWzOrLAcyO6hUZfgcQ4mO xHQgTgV5Tyxwt0q+FC4u+HmlFmh189dsiTkgvkudfMZdc7H4p5tRkL33FthXzmp4sbDq YQXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pua/NjQw8LSPVMTFaa8Fw9vsKvgmLoty/1sjzDt6+0csWgRyOsA2 ANWu5l5XxKkQxj+rHiHRu38gBTChugY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIaIfyg6cUwSowpAVOU7ID9BRybagQ3233Ekvv8j30pMwM018cn8kZvftggOmDWom0Frk6fYQ== X-Received: by 2002:a19:505b:: with SMTP id z27mr764857lfj.123.1588293605548; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:40:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f179.google.com (mail-lj1-f179.google.com. [209.85.208.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b9sm1193671lfp.27.2020.04.30.17.40.02 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f179.google.com with SMTP id b2so1315144ljp.4 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:40:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:814e:: with SMTP id t14mr886854ljg.204.1588293602471; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:40:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1962EE67-8AD1-409D-963A-4F1E1AB3B865@amacapital.net> In-Reply-To: <1962EE67-8AD1-409D-963A-4F1E1AB3B865@amacapital.net> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:39:46 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Replace and improve "mcsafe" with copy_safe() To: Andy Lutomirski Message-ID-Hash: 4MREIW3LBCNTYRZ6CYULXJNPCFAORXUU X-Message-ID-Hash: 4MREIW3LBCNTYRZ6CYULXJNPCFAORXUU X-MailFrom: torvalds@linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation CC: "Luck, Tony" , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , stable , the arch/x86 maintainers , "H. Peter Anvin" , Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Erwin Tsaur , Michael Ellerman , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-nvdimm , Linux Kernel Mailing List X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 T24gVGh1LCBBcHIgMzAsIDIwMjAgYXQgNToyMyBQTSBBbmR5IEx1dG9taXJza2kgPGx1dG9AYW1h Y2FwaXRhbC5uZXQ+IHdyb3RlOg0KPg0KPiA+IEJ1dCBhbnl3YXksIEkgZG9uJ3QgaGF0ZSBzb21l dGhpbmcgbGlrZSAiY29weV90b191c2VyX2ZhbGxpYmxlKCkiDQo+ID4gY29uY2VwdHVhbGx5LiBU aGUgbmFtaW5nIG5lZWRzIHRvIGJlIGZpeGVkLCBpbiB0aGF0ICJ1c2VyIiBjYW4gYWx3YXlzDQo+ ID4gdGFrZSBhIGZhdWx0LCBzbyBpdCdzIHRoZSBfc291cmNlXyB0aGF0IGNhbiBmYXVsdCwgbm90 IHRoZSAidXNlciINCj4gPiBwYXJ0Lg0KPg0KPiBJIGRvbuKAmXQgbGlrZSB0aGlzLiAg4oCcdXNl cuKAnSBhbHJlYWR5IGltcGxpZWQgdGhhdCBiYXNpY2FsbHkgYW55dGhpbmcgY2FuIGJlIHdyb25n IHdpdGggdGhlIG1lbW9yeQ0KDQpNYXliZSBJIGRpZG4ndCBleHBsYWluLg0KDQoidXNlciIgYWxy ZWFkeSBpbXBsaWVzIGZhdWx0aW5nLiBXZSBhZ3JlZS4NCg0KQW5kIHNpbmNlIHdlIGJ5IGRlZmlu aXRpb24gY2Fubm90IGtub3cgd2hhdCB0aGUgdXNlciBoYXMgbWFwcGVkIGludG8NCnVzZXIgc3Bh Y2UsICpldmVyeSogbm9ybWFsIGNvcHlfdG9fdXNlcigpIGhhcyB0byBiZSBhYmxlIHRvIGhhbmRs ZQ0Kd2hhdGV2ZXIgZmF1bHRzIHRoYXQgdGhyb3dzIGF0IHVzLg0KDQpUaGUgcmVhc29uIEkgZGlz bGlrZSAiY29weV90b191c2VyX2ZhbGxpYmxlKCkiIGlzIHRoYXQgdGhlIHVzZXIgc2lkZQ0KYWxy ZWFkeSBoYXMgdGhhdCAnZmFsbGlibGUiLg0KDQpJZiBpdCdzIHRoZSBfc291cmNlXyBiZWluZyAi ZmFsbGlibGUiIChpdCByZWFsbHkgbmVlZHMgYSBiZXR0ZXIgbmFtZSAtDQpJIHdpbGwgbm90IGNh bGwgaXQganVzdCAiZiIpIHRoZW4gaXQgc2hvdWxkIGJlICJjb3B5X2ZfdG9fdXNlcigpIi4NCg0K VGhhdCB3b3VsZCBiZSBvay4NCg0KU28gImNvcHlfZl90b191c2VyKCkiIG1ha2VzIHNlbnNlLiBC dXQgImNvcHlfdG9fdXNlcl9mKCkiIGRvZXMgbm90Lg0KVGhhdCBwdXRzIHRoZSAiZiIgb24gdGhl ICJ1c2VyIiwgd2hpY2ggd2UgYWxyZWFkeSBrbm93IGNhbiBmYXVsdC4NCg0KU2VlIHdoYXQgSSB3 YW50IGluIHRoZSBuYW1lPyBJIHdhbnQgdGhlIG5hbWUgdG8gc2F5IHdoaWNoIHNpZGUgY2FuDQpj YXVzZSBwcm9ibGVtcyENCg0KSWYgeW91IGFyZSBjb3B5aW5nIG1lbW9yeSBmcm9tIHNvbWUgZiBz b3VyY2UsIGl0IG11c3Qgbm90IGJlDQoiY29weV9zYWZlKCkiLiBUaGF0IGRvZXNuJ3Qgc2F5IGlm IHRoZSBfc291cmNlXyBpcyBmLCBvciB0aGUNCmRlc3RpbmF0aW9uIGlzIGYuDQoNClNvICJjb3B5 X3RvX2YoKSIgbWFrZXMgc2Vuc2UgKHdlIGRvbid0IHNheSAiY29weV9rZXJuZWxfdG9fdXNlcigp IiAtDQp0aGUgIm5vcm1hbCIgY2FzZSBpcyBzaWxlbnQpLCBhbmQgImNvcHlfZnJvbV9mKCkiIG1h a2VzIHNlbnNlLg0KImNvcHlfaW5fZigpIiBtYWtlcyBzZW5zZSB0b28uDQoNCkJ1dCBub3QgdGhp cyAicmFuZG9tbHkgY29weSBzb21lIHJhbmRvbWx5IGYgbWVtb3J5IGFyZWEgdGhhdCBJIGRvbid0 DQprbm93IGlmIGl0J3MgdGhlIHNvdXJjZSBvciB0aGUgZGVzdGluYXRpb24iLg0KDQpTb21ldGlt ZXMgeW91IG1heSB0aGVuIHVzZSBhIGNvbW1vbiBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbiBmb3IgdGhlIGRpZmZl cmVudA0KZGlyZWN0aW9ucyAtIGlmIHRoYXQgd29ya3Mgb24gdGhlIGFyY2hpdGVjdHVyZS4NCg0K Rm9yIGV4YW1wbGUsICJjb3B5X3RvX3VzZXIoKSIgYW5kICJjb3B5X2Zyb21fdXNlcigpIiBvbiB4 ODYgYm90aCBlbmQNCnVwIGludGVybmFsbHkgdXNpbmcgYSBzaGFyZWQgImNvcHlfdXNlcl9nZW5l cmljKCkiIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uLiBJDQp3aXNoIHRoYXQgd2Fzbid0IHRoZSBjYXNlICh3aGVu IEkgYXNrZWQgZm9yIHdoYXQgd2FzIHRvIGJlY29tZQ0KU1RBQy9DTEFDLCBJIGFza2VkIGZvciBv bmUgdGhhdCBjb3VsZCBkZXRlcm1pbmUgd2hpY2ggZGlyZWN0aW9uIG9mIGENCiJyZXAgbW92cyIg Y291bGQgdG91Y2ggdXNlciBzcGFjZSksIGJ1dCBpdCBzbyBoYXBwZW5zIHRoYXQgdGhlDQppbXBs ZW1lbnRhdGlvbnMgZW5kIHVwIGJlaW5nIHN5bW1ldHJpYyBvbiB4ODYuDQoNCkJ1dCB0aGF0J3Mg YSBwdXJlIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIGlzc3VlLCBhbmQgaXQgdmVyeSBtdWNoIGlzIG5vdCBnb2lu Zw0KdG8gYmUgdHJ1ZSBpbiBnZW5lcmFsLCBhbmQgaXQgc2hvdWxkbid0IGJlIGV4cG9zZWQgdG8g dXNlcnMgYXMgc3VjaA0KKGFuZCB3ZSBvYnZpb3VzbHkgZG9uJ3QpLg0KDQogICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgTGludXMKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18K TGludXgtbnZkaW1tIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdCAtLSBsaW51eC1udmRpbW1AbGlzdHMuMDEub3JnClRv IHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlIHNlbmQgYW4gZW1haWwgdG8gbGludXgtbnZkaW1tLWxlYXZlQGxpc3RzLjAx Lm9yZwo= From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B359C4724C for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 00:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB53520873 for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 00:40:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588293608; bh=iOYbwVyvYW0Kz7y+YkKXobFccg4c9g7nJ7J41snDZXE=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=H3toXKfE3Ef6L5dZ3vL59tK5qtxBxZC78D/P86xILs/lkajp2cFWHZxuHgsBj2SPF 5yPVyIIEgwkmn2Xt2K7ZRPljFS8It1hiGOg/WYxXwzl4qqPHIjxLAqfnQhR/hmCo8l ootl1JmY8UDKOXpVi/h5JWpa0wORJW1mjj5FHs2c= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727925AbgEAAkH (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:40:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43814 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726384AbgEAAkH (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:40:07 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x141.google.com (mail-lf1-x141.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::141]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A59C035494 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:40:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x141.google.com with SMTP id t11so2797989lfe.4 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:40:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sRFJfZwHnsJQqFJepe+LvPqS40H3J51FnSnbFsYaAJM=; b=AvUgqN7PB/2m6j6r3ChFqht9nBGFMbV8AKa9u30SyVlVrTUy+Tv1TOIg+df2atuDm9 mrQr9/kg7XzvTBlUGO0QByBQRaSsjKRXNdddPP7Y9Z8zjn9Nh1TKQSTFhhdcbHFIGZAm 23fUYndzjvvhniZu8dhlkJL4EDHoYqfSv1iW0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sRFJfZwHnsJQqFJepe+LvPqS40H3J51FnSnbFsYaAJM=; b=hYOH9Tm5u6lBXd53ot5IKTZFkP//ikh/jGJF2EHv2YTBrEighdJXCOt8WPzjgjl+xp +G9gCuoY7bXlpW7QXzf7O/c8HvhdLeH4TnOIhUbbEDbPbp2r0UIR7m2mzofwYF6RAaPw vfuK0as242Rngu6cIy31OWkgAi5mRaCxGDK+EMPsN1NCLc3uxwTvoDmrwbVF9+7eim8d EuYtORzvCpL1eQ+5t1fYNcmCDZigV/3Pv25++8va9IZt4dn4Pqg2DLVhGr7mDo0oL9em VglLTMToX3iJz6kte+R0VVFcFWyXNPqtUz6K49Tp9ezj9MhdvEOXHiwfXFfXdSeCjhdH lCuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYIV7FqsxwqGCMRsnci1ndUPctdbDKuxWXwZf4ty2ntggT3djP0 ri1cjZfcEqIN1dhQyy2FqTSz+QTOOjc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJZzW3czjSpgLtrvhayHcYwjJ8IepcX1vk8L0GQqqvG1sppDQYvz02PGcnLYPJf/mqmLF7xIQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4304:: with SMTP id l4mr818589lfh.87.1588293604399; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com (mail-lj1-f170.google.com. [209.85.208.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p14sm970206lfe.87.2020.04.30.17.40.02 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id w20so1351071ljj.0 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:40:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:814e:: with SMTP id t14mr886854ljg.204.1588293602471; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:40:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1962EE67-8AD1-409D-963A-4F1E1AB3B865@amacapital.net> In-Reply-To: <1962EE67-8AD1-409D-963A-4F1E1AB3B865@amacapital.net> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:39:46 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Replace and improve "mcsafe" with copy_safe() To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Dan Williams , "Luck, Tony" , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , stable , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Erwin Tsaur , Michael Ellerman , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-nvdimm , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:23 PM Andy Lutomirski wrote= : > > > But anyway, I don't hate something like "copy_to_user_fallible()" > > conceptually. The naming needs to be fixed, in that "user" can always > > take a fault, so it's the _source_ that can fault, not the "user" > > part. > > I don=E2=80=99t like this. =E2=80=9Cuser=E2=80=9D already implied that b= asically anything can be wrong with the memory Maybe I didn't explain. "user" already implies faulting. We agree. And since we by definition cannot know what the user has mapped into user space, *every* normal copy_to_user() has to be able to handle whatever faults that throws at us. The reason I dislike "copy_to_user_fallible()" is that the user side already has that 'fallible". If it's the _source_ being "fallible" (it really needs a better name - I will not call it just "f") then it should be "copy_f_to_user()". That would be ok. So "copy_f_to_user()" makes sense. But "copy_to_user_f()" does not. That puts the "f" on the "user", which we already know can fault. See what I want in the name? I want the name to say which side can cause problems! If you are copying memory from some f source, it must not be "copy_safe()". That doesn't say if the _source_ is f, or the destination is f. So "copy_to_f()" makes sense (we don't say "copy_kernel_to_user()" - the "normal" case is silent), and "copy_from_f()" makes sense. "copy_in_f()" makes sense too. But not this "randomly copy some randomly f memory area that I don't know if it's the source or the destination". Sometimes you may then use a common implementation for the different directions - if that works on the architecture. For example, "copy_to_user()" and "copy_from_user()" on x86 both end up internally using a shared "copy_user_generic()" implementation. I wish that wasn't the case (when I asked for what was to become STAC/CLAC, I asked for one that could determine which direction of a "rep movs" could touch user space), but it so happens that the implementations end up being symmetric on x86. But that's a pure implementation issue, and it very much is not going to be true in general, and it shouldn't be exposed to users as such (and we obviously don't). Linus