From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (146.0.238.70:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 08 Mar 2019 00:36:38 -0000 Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1h23V7-0005Fj-I9 for speck@linutronix.de; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 01:36:37 +0100 Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id z20so15941206ljj.10 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 16:36:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf1-f52.google.com (mail-lf1-f52.google.com. [209.85.167.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l10sm1119506lfk.26.2019.03.07.16.36.30 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Mar 2019 16:36:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-f52.google.com with SMTP id i13so1417389lfg.10 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 16:36:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190301214738.281554861@linutronix.de> <20190301214847.524432729@linutronix.de> <20190307235614.GF7535@tassilo.jf.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20190307235614.GF7535@tassilo.jf.intel.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 16:36:14 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [patch V6 04/14] MDS basics 4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:56 PM speck for Andi Kleen wrote: > > Xeon Phi will simply not be mitigated. However Xeon PHIs are not widely > used, Heh. Understatement of the year. > and those that are deployed can be handled in different ways. I don't think anybody uses them in situations that would care. The main target was HPC, I think. So I think the "handled in different ways" ends up being "ignored", I suspect. Linus