From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18478C11F65 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 20:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE27E6144B for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 20:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233942AbhF3UVa (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:21:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48394 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233847AbhF3UVa (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:21:30 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 056DFC061756 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id bu19so7412726lfb.9 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:18:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8uHCeNsWSpVWECrUi4Y/xqmo8wXTCMTkmLJbaCr3ZP4=; b=c+9SisOgxve77SCTD8wDP1XQlimGlwrqbzIth0TQ9nUGQ13OnSr5DTJ9SBwNyXtoSM WkGJ8uBAgc3dTuKsqSCZugu0zXrw/GhWX/xoXxqob1qrzhZgezaWUENc0axWV4ze+YP7 TTgT0SyjbqYxKuNnzmAtp8k5ZVZx1H/PW1wic= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8uHCeNsWSpVWECrUi4Y/xqmo8wXTCMTkmLJbaCr3ZP4=; b=fRDYH38DPtwEFAEvt/o5YVQS060sdtLe4H6G64mUKa/KqumHIg15N7yQSBo+Iq84Sf X8T8YHnZJuYTGyCtj6+g1KEBmMtDYR2sOhgC4or0u0kQIND8M7rvpWaHimRRau0z9yUo T2WqYGnV6Dw9oXyCjGK6OWRJropPg8Xvx8Ff9D66tCX+IWtoEktxrOZHY4+KWjxnJ7Ex +upXjCG510VAnOUramP8pylwm5EdS6EqNgVEcp/N4xRHHVFVkHLCjoMVeF0wHSPduBg+ v2NoNwJy8DPvUxC7UsZy0aQnIOFHV2wR8Asn6FYFHHo0Im5b3gEzVxyU8tDp+tp/mkdF 6JEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532m0WmncLWJ7bRy4XVFplWPR1tx3MyCsG952q/rE9wwLcAqnEfT b9D4Ps6asOh+XoN3GKeMPEQRp4cW+9cGcVxsiWQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMxeKRoYy2DMgnpfhSpVb4EEwXCl47SzuuXyEaYtUQjRqon93hos8HBDcXiEbjcxFJ8ARIhg== X-Received: by 2002:a19:f505:: with SMTP id j5mr29375355lfb.126.1625084338054; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f172.google.com (mail-lj1-f172.google.com. [209.85.208.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q66sm2361988ljb.83.2021.06.30.13.18.57 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f172.google.com with SMTP id c11so5036353ljd.6 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:18:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9c58:: with SMTP id t24mr8974575ljj.411.1625084337277; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:18:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <00f21ea0-2f38-f554-63e9-ef07e806a0cd@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: <00f21ea0-2f38-f554-63e9-ef07e806a0cd@kernel.dk> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:18:41 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] io_uring updates for 5.14-rc1 To: Jens Axboe Cc: Al Viro , Dmitry Kadashev , io-uring Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 1:14 PM Jens Axboe wrote: > > I think you're being very unfair here, last release was pretty > uneventful, and of course 5.12 was a bit too exciting with the > thread changes, but that was both expected and a necessary evil. The last one may have been uneventful, but I really want to keep it that way. And the threading changes were an improvement overall, but they were by no means the first time io_uring was flaky and had issues. It has caused a _lot_ of churn over the years. And I refuse to have that churn now affect fs/namei.c This had better be done right, or not at all. Linus