All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Remove dynamic NOP selection
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:36:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiXUVwytv60Zst_--y=yGbRGUAn1AgRTyzjJfoOO5B+9w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEtZ63iAralvR9eC@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 4:09 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> Note that this also made all NOPs single instructions and removed the
> special atomic nop.

Ack. Good riddance.

             Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-12 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-12 11:32 [PATCH 0/2] x86: Remove ideal_nops[] Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-12 11:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Remove dynamic NOP selection Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-12 12:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-12 20:36     ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2021-03-15 18:00   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2024-01-20  6:58   ` [PATCH 1/2] " Thorsten Glaser
2024-01-20  8:22     ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-01-20 16:53       ` Thorsten Glaser
2024-01-21 23:21         ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-01-21 23:58           ` Thorsten Glaser
2024-01-22  0:15             ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-01-22  0:56               ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-22  1:17                 ` Thorsten Glaser
2024-01-22  2:04                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-01-22  2:15                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-01-22  2:22                   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-22  2:31                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-01-20 17:00       ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-20 17:19         ` Thorsten Glaser
2024-01-20 18:21           ` disassemblers (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Remove dynamic NOP selection) Thorsten Glaser
2024-01-21 22:36         ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Remove dynamic NOP selection David Laight
2024-01-21 23:10           ` H. Peter Anvin
2021-03-12 11:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] objtool,x86: Use asm/nops.h Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-15 18:00   ` [tip: x86/cpu] objtool/x86: " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-12 14:29 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86: Remove ideal_nops[] Sedat Dilek
2021-03-12 14:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-12 17:26     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-12 17:35       ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-12 17:46         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-12 17:47         ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-12 18:13           ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-12 19:03             ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-12 20:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-13  5:26   ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-13  8:49     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-13 11:23       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-13 12:10       ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-13 12:15         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-13 12:38           ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-13 12:49             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-13 12:58               ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-13 13:29                 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-13 13:47                   ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-15 17:04                     ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-15 17:15                       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-15 17:19                         ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-15 17:23                           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-15 18:10                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-15 18:23                         ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-15 22:14                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-16  5:56                             ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-27 12:08                               ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-27 20:02                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-03-30 12:31                                   ` Sedat Dilek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wiXUVwytv60Zst_--y=yGbRGUAn1AgRTyzjJfoOO5B+9w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.