All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/8] READ_ONCE: Drop pointer qualifiers when reading from scalar types
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 10:54:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wia5ppBsfHLMx648utCjO01JAZiME0K0eSHmhWuRyL+6w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200110165636.28035-7-will@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 643 bytes --]

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:56 AM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> +/* Declare an unqualified scalar type. Leaves non-scalar types unchanged. */
> +#define __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) typeof(                                      \

Ugh. My eyes. That's horrendous.

I can't see any better alternatives, but it does make me go "Eww".

Well, I do see one possible alternative: just re-write the bitop
implementations in terms of "atomic_long_t", and just avoid the issue
entirely.

IOW, do something like the attached (but fleshed out and tested - this
patch has not seen a compiler, much less any thought at all).

                   Linus

[-- Attachment #2: patch.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1107 bytes --]

 include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h b/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
index 3ae021368f48..071d8bfd86e5 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
@@ -6,6 +6,12 @@
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <asm/barrier.h>
 
+/* Drop the volatile, we will be doing READ_ONCE by hand */
+static inline atomic_long_t *atomic_long_bit_word(unsigned int nr, volatile unsigned long *p)
+{
+	return BIT_WORD(nr) + (atomic_long_t *)p;
+}
+
 /**
  * test_and_set_bit_lock - Set a bit and return its old value, for lock
  * @nr: Bit to set
@@ -20,12 +26,12 @@ static inline int test_and_set_bit_lock(unsigned int nr,
 {
 	long old;
 	unsigned long mask = BIT_MASK(nr);
+	atomic_long_t *loc = atomic_long_bit_word(nr, p);
 
-	p += BIT_WORD(nr);
-	if (READ_ONCE(*p) & mask)
+	if (atomic_read(loc) & mask)
 		return 1;
 
-	old = atomic_long_fetch_or_acquire(mask, (atomic_long_t *)p);
+	old = atomic_long_fetch_or_acquire(mask, loc);
 	return !!(old & mask);
 }
 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-10 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-10 16:56 [RFC PATCH 0/8] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen Will Deacon
2020-01-10 16:56 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] compiler/gcc: Emit build-time warning for GCC prior to version 4.8 Will Deacon
2020-01-10 17:35   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-10 17:53     ` Joe Perches
2020-01-13 14:39       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-13 15:35         ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-01-13 14:27     ` Will Deacon
2020-01-14 21:39     ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-01-15 10:35       ` David Laight
2020-01-15 10:49       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-10 16:56 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] netfilter: Avoid assigning 'const' pointer to non-const pointer Will Deacon
2020-01-10 16:56 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] fault_inject: Don't rely on "return value" from WRITE_ONCE() Will Deacon
2020-01-10 16:56 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] READ_ONCE: Simplify implementations of {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() Will Deacon
2020-01-10 16:56 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] READ_ONCE: Enforce atomicity for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() memory accesses Will Deacon
2020-01-10 19:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-13 16:16     ` Will Deacon
2020-01-10 16:56 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] READ_ONCE: Drop pointer qualifiers when reading from scalar types Will Deacon
2020-01-10 18:54   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2020-01-13 14:59     ` Will Deacon
2020-01-13 17:42       ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-01-13 19:31       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-01-10 16:56 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] locking/barriers: Use '__unqual_scalar_typeof' for load-acquire macros Will Deacon
2020-01-10 19:42   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-13 15:01     ` Will Deacon
2020-01-10 16:56 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] arm64: barrier: Use '__unqual_scalar_typeof' for acquire/release macros Will Deacon
2020-01-10 17:45   ` Mark Rutland
2020-01-10 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-10 19:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-10 20:14   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-01-13 13:03     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-13 11:20 ` David Laight
2020-01-13 12:40 ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wia5ppBsfHLMx648utCjO01JAZiME0K0eSHmhWuRyL+6w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.