From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@gmail.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
"Richard Russon (FlatCap)" <ldm@flatcap.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@nxp.com>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
"openrisc@lists.librecores.org" <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sparc <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net"
<linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] Unify asm/unaligned.h around struct helper
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:22:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wih8UHDwJ8x6m-p0PQ7o4S4gOBwGNs=w=q10GNY7A-70w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2408c893-4ae7-4f53-f58c-497c91f5b034@synopsys.com>
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:52 AM Vineet Gupta
<Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote:
>
> Wasn't the new zlib code slated for 5.14. I don't see it in your master yet
You're right, I never actually committed it, since it was specific to
ARC and -O3 and I wasn't entirely happy with the amount of testing it
got (with Heiko pointing out that the s390 stuff needed more fixes for
the change).
So in fact it's not even queued up for 5.14 due to this all, I just dropped it.
> > and the biggy
> > case didn't even use "get_unaligned()").
>
> Indeed this series is sort of orthogonal to that bug, but IMO that bug
> still exists in 5.13 for -O3 build, granted that is not enabled for !ARC.
Right, the zlib bug is still there.
But Arnd's series wouldn't even fix it: right now inffast has its own
- ugly and slow - special 2-byte-only version of "get_unaligned()",
called "get_unaligned16()".
And because it's ugly and slow, it's not actually used for
CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.
Vineet - maybe the fix is to not take my patch to update to a newer
zlib, but to just fix inffast to use the proper get_unaligned(). Then
Arnd's series _would_ actually fix all this..
Linus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"Richard Russon \(FlatCap\)" <ldm@flatcap.org>,
Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-sparc <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@gmail.com>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
"openrisc@lists.librecores.org" <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
"linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net"
<linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] Unify asm/unaligned.h around struct helper
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:22:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wih8UHDwJ8x6m-p0PQ7o4S4gOBwGNs=w=q10GNY7A-70w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2408c893-4ae7-4f53-f58c-497c91f5b034@synopsys.com>
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:52 AM Vineet Gupta
<Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote:
>
> Wasn't the new zlib code slated for 5.14. I don't see it in your master yet
You're right, I never actually committed it, since it was specific to
ARC and -O3 and I wasn't entirely happy with the amount of testing it
got (with Heiko pointing out that the s390 stuff needed more fixes for
the change).
So in fact it's not even queued up for 5.14 due to this all, I just dropped it.
> > and the biggy
> > case didn't even use "get_unaligned()").
>
> Indeed this series is sort of orthogonal to that bug, but IMO that bug
> still exists in 5.13 for -O3 build, granted that is not enabled for !ARC.
Right, the zlib bug is still there.
But Arnd's series wouldn't even fix it: right now inffast has its own
- ugly and slow - special 2-byte-only version of "get_unaligned()",
called "get_unaligned16()".
And because it's ugly and slow, it's not actually used for
CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.
Vineet - maybe the fix is to not take my patch to update to a newer
zlib, but to just fix inffast to use the proper get_unaligned(). Then
Arnd's series _would_ actually fix all this..
Linus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@gmail.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
"Richard Russon (FlatCap)" <ldm@flatcap.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@nxp.com>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
"openrisc@lists.librecores.org" <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sparc <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net"
<linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] Unify asm/unaligned.h around struct helper
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:22:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wih8UHDwJ8x6m-p0PQ7o4S4gOBwGNs=w=q10GNY7A-70w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2408c893-4ae7-4f53-f58c-497c91f5b034@synopsys.com>
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:52 AM Vineet Gupta
<Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote:
>
> Wasn't the new zlib code slated for 5.14. I don't see it in your master yet
You're right, I never actually committed it, since it was specific to
ARC and -O3 and I wasn't entirely happy with the amount of testing it
got (with Heiko pointing out that the s390 stuff needed more fixes for
the change).
So in fact it's not even queued up for 5.14 due to this all, I just dropped it.
> > and the biggy
> > case didn't even use "get_unaligned()").
>
> Indeed this series is sort of orthogonal to that bug, but IMO that bug
> still exists in 5.13 for -O3 build, granted that is not enabled for !ARC.
Right, the zlib bug is still there.
But Arnd's series wouldn't even fix it: right now inffast has its own
- ugly and slow - special 2-byte-only version of "get_unaligned()",
called "get_unaligned16()".
And because it's ugly and slow, it's not actually used for
CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.
Vineet - maybe the fix is to not take my patch to update to a newer
zlib, but to just fix inffast to use the proper get_unaligned(). Then
Arnd's series _would_ actually fix all this..
Linus
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v2 00/13] Unify asm/unaligned.h around struct helper
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:22:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wih8UHDwJ8x6m-p0PQ7o4S4gOBwGNs=w=q10GNY7A-70w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2408c893-4ae7-4f53-f58c-497c91f5b034@synopsys.com>
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:52 AM Vineet Gupta
<Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote:
>
> Wasn't the new zlib code slated for 5.14. I don't see it in your master yet
You're right, I never actually committed it, since it was specific to
ARC and -O3 and I wasn't entirely happy with the amount of testing it
got (with Heiko pointing out that the s390 stuff needed more fixes for
the change).
So in fact it's not even queued up for 5.14 due to this all, I just dropped it.
> > and the biggy
> > case didn't even use "get_unaligned()").
>
> Indeed this series is sort of orthogonal to that bug, but IMO that bug
> still exists in 5.13 for -O3 build, granted that is not enabled for !ARC.
Right, the zlib bug is still there.
But Arnd's series wouldn't even fix it: right now inffast has its own
- ugly and slow - special 2-byte-only version of "get_unaligned()",
called "get_unaligned16()".
And because it's ugly and slow, it's not actually used for
CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.
Vineet - maybe the fix is to not take my patch to update to a newer
zlib, but to just fix inffast to use the proper get_unaligned(). Then
Arnd's series _would_ actually fix all this..
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-14 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-14 10:00 [PATCH v2 00/13] Unify asm/unaligned.h around struct helper Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] asm-generic: use asm-generic/unaligned.h for most architectures Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] openrisc: always use unaligned-struct header Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] sh: remove unaligned access for sh4a Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:34 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-05-14 12:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-15 15:36 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2021-05-15 20:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] m68k: select CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] powerpc: use linux/unaligned/le_struct.h on LE power7 Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 11:48 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-05-14 11:48 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-05-14 13:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] asm-generic: unaligned: remove byteshift helpers Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] asm-generic: unaligned always use struct helpers Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 21:53 ` Eric Biggers
2021-05-17 21:53 ` Eric Biggers
2021-05-18 7:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 7:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 14:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-18 14:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-18 15:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 15:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 16:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-18 16:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-18 18:09 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-05-18 18:09 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-05-18 20:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 20:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 21:31 ` Eric Biggers
2021-05-18 21:31 ` Eric Biggers
2021-05-18 21:14 ` David Laight
2021-05-18 21:14 ` David Laight
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] partitions: msdos: fix one-byte get_unaligned() Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 10:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-17 10:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] apparmor: use get_unaligned() only for multi-byte words Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] mwifiex: re-fix for unaligned accesses Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-15 6:22 ` Kalle Valo
2021-05-15 9:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-15 18:23 ` Kalle Valo
2021-05-14 10:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] netpoll: avoid put_unaligned() on single character Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] asm-generic: uaccess: 1-byte access is always aligned Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-15 18:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-05-15 20:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] asm-generic: simplify asm/unaligned.h Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 10:35 ` David Laight
2021-05-14 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] Unify asm/unaligned.h around struct helper Linus Torvalds
2021-05-14 17:32 ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2021-05-14 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-14 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-14 18:51 ` Vineet Gupta
2021-05-14 18:51 ` [OpenRISC] " Vineet Gupta
2021-05-14 18:51 ` Vineet Gupta
2021-05-14 18:51 ` Vineet Gupta
2021-05-14 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2021-05-14 19:22 ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2021-05-14 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-14 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-14 19:45 ` Vineet Gupta
2021-05-14 19:45 ` [OpenRISC] " Vineet Gupta
2021-05-14 19:45 ` Vineet Gupta
2021-05-14 19:45 ` Vineet Gupta
2021-05-14 20:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-14 20:19 ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2021-05-14 20:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-14 20:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-05-14 19:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 19:31 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 19:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-14 19:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-16 17:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-16 17:29 ` [OpenRISC] " Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-16 17:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-16 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-16 17:42 ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2021-12-16 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-16 17:49 ` David Laight
2021-12-16 17:49 ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2021-12-16 17:49 ` David Laight
2021-12-16 18:56 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-12-16 18:56 ` [OpenRISC] " Segher Boessenkool
2021-12-16 18:56 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-12-17 12:34 ` David Laight
2021-12-17 12:34 ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2021-12-17 12:34 ` David Laight
2021-12-17 13:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-12-17 13:35 ` [OpenRISC] " Segher Boessenkool
2021-12-17 13:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wih8UHDwJ8x6m-p0PQ7o4S4gOBwGNs=w=q10GNY7A-70w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=amitkarwar@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=ganapathi017@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=huxinming820@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=jonas@southpole.se \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ldm@flatcap.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sharvari.harisangam@nxp.com \
--cc=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.