From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611F4C2D0DB for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 19:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390EB206D4 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 19:43:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580326985; bh=/gjyf9AQ4O4mRn6i4sIDzF+n2LYyLSGVFVQDZkW5BmA=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=TLMSqdSzusLr8rl1juVGhP5aZ60IPduYgXQD3JYBUBwrhnWnpinB5RT5JcQz/C8pu q4J4Nhuczz/X4FhVJuQ9msej1laDrOsXDpHWVUSDdx9oi73hM1+vNEcX+QRmT7VYsC BxB8M5pN//NDsZf3Ad1m1DBrZA0p76CLpaenYN6c= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727445AbgA2TnE (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:43:04 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com ([209.85.208.195]:40089 "EHLO mail-lj1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727235AbgA2TnE (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:43:04 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id n18so662180ljo.7 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:43:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E0EZyoS/3ZVFNKf5OpzTDCl696I7Q5Ua1W/UsyB4vc4=; b=SrDLlp+9KTbulMwqm+ZHq4unesxbaoVmQLamNY4Ub7v4WdOsJeU6vOmhVWMpMXLvlR PmjC8hY2HN9D6Ap3/etUdMHMPpUcN9Vo9gRRoIriCeNpYK3oiyDn5v/Q5rj1LupUyrmS VvwfumYbOMMY38P8JIdrCj9k7L3NRwv4xxV2Q= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E0EZyoS/3ZVFNKf5OpzTDCl696I7Q5Ua1W/UsyB4vc4=; b=DlJtrTZB3p9TckNzLkZJEugns4LFs0x4UyNqZQkNWlbWmwCA96y7fC4Q6vPBNUSA1v 94s2LIMSwHcq1VaeM9uq557g7X0rhG4ZzT+nBKs3NM9efXGUU5JlxiBOQkmZeS+gCDfR 6PxcFoAdzyTJ27x8FXEVuiwfilHDXt2IPl005TlR3T2XIfUqpc3sTGMbAzR5mn2dcP8D xwTlmrQHkC+Ze5gzGgSIdTzekMO47tKjOF+J32ASLn39RlxFnvrtaDkpCjubqaQbFMd3 m3RRRxSQvfiisdnZ+cQOJYA309yhzRCt587PcV64kL7LhdUozAhCa8BxgcxkBTraqDmb nmmA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXCE47qHHDDBir8jIv5Jkht5TMj3/Ms78xwInwceIbQo9MPwQO/ ADmgCU+8bn/T2kTRFXF5hW39ML4Qf+c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMIPcnNbmAgsx/DZEkNrFITJEfDfiKBuYO5Z7F9ohNNnxgDGyZzoIw7Zpnp5h8p6TkO/yYOw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b4af:: with SMTP id q15mr432639ljm.43.1580326981546; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:43:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com (mail-lj1-f182.google.com. [209.85.208.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t27sm1522378ljd.26.2020.01.29.11.43.00 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:43:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id n18so662074ljo.7 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:43:00 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:580c:: with SMTP id m12mr477334ljb.150.1580326980237; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:43:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200128.172544.1405211638887784147.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20200128.172544.1405211638887784147.davem@davemloft.net> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:42:44 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking To: David Miller , Paolo Abeni , Christoph Paasch Cc: Andrew Morton , Netdev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:26 AM David Miller wrote: > > 12) Add initial support for MPTCP protocol, from Christoph Paasch, > Matthieu Baerts, Florian Westphal, Peter Krystad, and many > others. Hmm. This adds a MPTCP_HMAC_TEST config variable, and while it is "default n" (which is redundant - 'n' is the default anyway), it should likely instead be "depends on MPTCP". Because right now, if you say no to MPTCP, it will _still_ ask you about MPTCP_HMAC_TEST, which makes no sense. Even if you were to say 'y', there won't be any tests done since MPTCP isn't built at all. Linus