From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCF0C432C1 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A34207FD for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:45:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1569285911; bh=jUOVPpZS0x/8ppptq3CkH489ohfvKfn6jyaaqEc/zBE=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=HmN1tg8wTecIyjFV5/f/hhBFQ3+fSW0S4uDk08w+CTi5Wp/2745Ae0uMB56NaYz59 Ua23CeYF8fQE+h/mmTEZvqHoSBapS+CZ32+GzWkKlX47R8T5gLGXrd0xoqSMyEM3kr UP9CvSQbf/belmD307N4H4GninpZ6RFCKYcpLgNQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2503675AbfIXApK (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:45:10 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com ([209.85.167.68]:32776 "EHLO mail-lf1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729276AbfIXApK (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:45:10 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id y127so15433lfc.0 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:45:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/64PPB5d/u2+0Z5QEyaFUQb1FXYalWwnZUF4/RRNz2Y=; b=Jek3G9kVUtkQOqQMOKqOrV9gVq5lSipvNe1iluOEV7QCIIEX8CSTzqF5gfy5LKWl2J kqpKIiiZkZaEJHYhdRCKUm9aQzXs6yqjFUmlSpKajn5B07EYRrME+BaMwsXVcHP0tQlt o5pN+77AupV1rOKlfhXo2xpkgOn6wGfpwSHPk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/64PPB5d/u2+0Z5QEyaFUQb1FXYalWwnZUF4/RRNz2Y=; b=iIuPwyOZZDzZEWBE4yXhKaS4v6s2p7o4EYO1FAfy7iFlbGxNK1jgvsfJVwGlHjTryf yEBSdZfKZ7QdhpUgU2bKYqAi60BTNpvEkmB0v2ttyqedZ4I8DnLw9fOAbzbI29yspeXT YuLwhWhFxp9Nk3XBifMdjGy4kr85zxXJvpFUJIwzI5ao+L839AZvYjIEM33DULcf/njX icpJm8nWpKC9ADgFawWZoQARCQ1aiZ+zazGUx/Wou8u3ToKcvncerwLDIOvQcVEHYaRa N5ogncXwV/ODpg3Ov1ChJpFJ/A82she7wEc7h7K35F2iYKkf5lebwsa8LIpU1wyv0v1x 0HMA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX8fY4a4w1fKZj4kgABeOiBaFycf3wR4fmO/wMi79kU1H+6nUMv zgEiw+FOmYhG78JSNRSsSWpC59laeZI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqywZeN64i9d5UdDeHWCiDju86JV3NFfhonDH4e7lIbUK4fjqBC3YGpn0VRsnyKu+DuieJwYiA== X-Received: by 2002:a19:da01:: with SMTP id r1mr2432lfg.150.1569285907164; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f177.google.com (mail-lj1-f177.google.com. [209.85.208.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n3sm53296lfl.62.2019.09.23.17.45.06 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f177.google.com with SMTP id a22so73446ljd.0 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:45:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9854:: with SMTP id e20mr37660ljj.72.1569285905710; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:45:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190923233038.GE7828@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> In-Reply-To: <20190923233038.GE7828@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:44:49 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID LSM changes for 5.4 To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Micah Morton , Jann Horn , Bart Van Assche , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-security-module Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:30 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > I pushed some (untested) commits out to the dev branch of -rcu, the > overall effect of which is shown in the patch below. The series > adds a new rcu_replace() to avoid confusion with swap(), replaces > uses of rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace(), and finally removes > rcu_swap_protected(). > > Is this what you had in mind? > > Unless you tell me otherwise, I will assume that this change is important > but not violently urgent. (As in not for the current merge window.) Ack, looks good to me, Linus