From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ED1C433ED for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 07:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1995B613D6 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 07:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230426AbhEGHNb (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2021 03:13:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43654 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230131AbhEGHNa (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2021 03:13:30 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ADEFC061574 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 00:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id c3so11368109lfs.7 for ; Fri, 07 May 2021 00:12:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vZU6CZhyeJkt24upSsaVh0Sfws7MZza4FtVyrq444RM=; b=Up1YaHxbYZwLL0nZA8XeLJy0/KBx+SrVCE+SEqvwZfE/8l6A203fwih7kJbOQWI6qA pW9e8mXYDVhIQ8z5QKGzH8zAu/BPEDbQ1/0XyU3NG8s4jdRT17JozMg1qiAUiCzx5wNi 8w5IHRe1dHEoNyfGHAZW9whVlloqxgRCSbFQk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vZU6CZhyeJkt24upSsaVh0Sfws7MZza4FtVyrq444RM=; b=iwqNw1Ud6coSEfV/xS+U/Gx6WCTBs7RtRmZcve+UDLVm1YJoaPn5Sj3lwhYjQhupCo qBSP3KdaavvMLwGhmlnANR3Jwm5DDO4JMLlmiC+1dOgGMo0SbnTKl7WQZpLv/aITH3X6 47YSQvK8buduUsJJCkvidUXTM0eQu0IOX+8TDNYP9m10CAHiyg99DjsLpzQXktA+qV8t NntNqRx8kM2o3cAi/FOycXWhAaLUTfadFok0Tkzl1zQ2WIriPVT7EXjOnPW5/+7nYamx 6CNzj3X1q3fdBJuIuP+zZ3dQwlZo/VK4UT9UGD+B7A7GQVVouni22a8VUhZf8f2kBNyP XO4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wpgiLcPJ695uUX9TJdp2sGgxD6ruDwprJZ46baROj49s5BbLh z8fHEd91MeAc1UvriynwQ0cVAF7dhg+0WByojzs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxpeSSdWqpDatjQPLDgpHZ33rdHWkcaLCF2718d0TFjrtNVELgW3wNwZYtmNDHXltXE+/mvLw== X-Received: by 2002:a19:ac4d:: with SMTP id r13mr5185788lfc.360.1620371547911; Fri, 07 May 2021 00:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f177.google.com (mail-lj1-f177.google.com. [209.85.208.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v16sm1254223lfi.131.2021.05.07.00.12.26 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 May 2021 00:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f177.google.com with SMTP id u25so10276321ljg.7 for ; Fri, 07 May 2021 00:12:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:3de:: with SMTP id f30mr6489888ljp.251.1620371546749; Fri, 07 May 2021 00:12:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210506180126.03e1baee7ca52bedb6cc6003@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20210506180126.03e1baee7ca52bedb6cc6003@linux-foundation.org> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 00:12:10 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: incoming To: Andrew Morton Cc: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, Linux-MM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:01 PM Andrew Morton wrote: > > I've been wobbly about the secretmem patches due to doubts about > whether the feature is sufficiently useful to justify inclusion, but > developers are now weighing in with helpful information and I've asked Mike > for an extensively updated [0/n] changelog. This will take a few days > to play out so it is possible that I will prevail upon you for a post-rc1 > merge. Oh, much too late for this release by now. > If that's a problem, there's always 5.13-rc1. 5.13-rc1 is two days from now, it would be for 5.14-rc1.. How time - and version numbers - fly. Linus