From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: switch to atomic_t for request references
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:35:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjXmGt9-JQp-wvup4y2tFNUCVjvx2W7MHzuAaxpryP4mg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ya3KZiLg5lYjsGcQ@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:31 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> Quite; and for something that pretends to be about performance, it also
> lacks any actual numbers to back that claim.
>
> The proposed implementation also doesn't do nearly as much as the
> refcount_t one does.
Stop pretending refcoutn_t is that great.
It's horrid. The code it generators is disgusting. It should never
have been inlines in the first place, and the design decsisions were
questionable to begin with.
There's a reason core stuff (like the page counters) DO NOT USE REFCOUNT_T.
I seriously believe that refcount_t should be used for things like
device reference counting or similar issues, and not for _any_ truly
core code.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-06 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 15:35 [PATCH] block: switch to atomic_t for request references Jens Axboe
2021-12-03 15:56 ` Keith Busch
2021-12-06 6:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-06 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-06 16:32 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-06 17:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-06 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2021-12-06 18:13 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-06 20:51 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-06 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-06 23:28 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-07 0:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-07 4:56 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-07 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-07 16:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-07 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-07 16:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-07 16:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-06 16:31 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-07 11:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-07 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-07 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-07 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-07 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-07 17:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-07 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-07 17:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-07 20:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-07 23:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-08 17:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-08 18:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-08 18:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-08 18:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-08 20:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-10 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-10 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wjXmGt9-JQp-wvup4y2tFNUCVjvx2W7MHzuAaxpryP4mg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.