From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C92C433ED for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 19:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D565461492 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 19:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231920AbhEJTC1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 15:02:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40654 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229566AbhEJTCZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 15:02:25 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDBB5C061574 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id y9so22114276ljn.6 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:01:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=58v46rcCymqbvtdlk+9Wce0rlMfWCPjj+b2+CKWyW8E=; b=f9FifjRkXHq08mKJ154sOQ5A2E5MZKBMXeMrI5AIO/a85ofps0EU79nu77X6CeZ0At RZw3FojIUm0g1nh9r0V0mIM8UmEg2bfP1abzhlHVWwgwQxt3sYka5foygoibvN4kRYkU yRjFzS52q4Xyapp4QsDxi6Zo/sA8t1T90gC+c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=58v46rcCymqbvtdlk+9Wce0rlMfWCPjj+b2+CKWyW8E=; b=PxjuSbr5RIH8w9UaFhVd8tyD7hrhesn9QBY1j7ggRYsKn42k0xNZMbSmXJHHZ83edK 1l389a8sEWxr4vYEWBgcCbK76DjpEEw75IJQWDKSk1GZmM0Py72Yixn+5+EMQpD30XEk JXWeblIhlivrqvLjXCUYyVd8mf2/6wVAkl1WkGQH2Mr09o6iulAMa1B1vMrxH2q712cz vtrdPmCfVbAX3qFtZSHAY8J0Uv65cvfhBY7hR6VUMaFxCd8lrpIorg9HAEXgOqjQWo7m lPCjrPK8R+SxGgcP1ltm1dz5Q4V0phQ/j8bMz6Bbc7Dq/5kUBFLnMteT8uiIaMK+VXwD e0kQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53130Rq1cQ1A1bgwIt0de2e7BzYzqC8xj56gG1wXwzyeRbU+LF6A vcLmD/+/QWyc9btr2C5Jw6LgREjS5XNaR2rHKMI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2vZ1mzLe7Mv887ovbM0d195Lega8EKxGc0HswGrDZq0S6JoNozvQISItz2/wPkLySO+rY6w== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:854a:: with SMTP id u10mr20530047ljj.455.1620673277101; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:01:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com (mail-lf1-f46.google.com. [209.85.167.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m16sm2367333lfg.229.2021.05.10.12.01.16 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 May 2021 12:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id x20so24964572lfu.6 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:01:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a19:7504:: with SMTP id y4mr17153559lfe.41.1620673276528; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:01:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210510025414.GA2041281@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <20210510025414.GA2041281@roeck-us.net> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 12:01:00 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux 5.13-rc1 To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 7:54 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Qemu test results: > total: 462 pass: 460 fail: 2 > Failed tests: > arm:raspi2:multi_v7_defconfig:net,usb:bcm2836-rpi-2-b:initrd > arm:raspi2:multi_v7_defconfig:sd:net,usb:bcm2836-rpi-2-b:rootfs > > The raspi2 problem (a crash in of_clk_add_hw_provider) is well known. > It was introduced with commit 6579c8d97ad7 ("clk: Mark fwnodes when > their clock provider is added"). Unfortunately it appears that there > is still no agreement on how to fix it. Hmm. I see https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210426065618.588144-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com/ and don't see any objections to that version. Does that fix it for you too? I'm assuming I'll get that through the usual channels. > There is also a repeated warning > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:550 irq_domain_associate+0x194/0x1f0 > > in some pxa boot tests. It looks like that problem has been fixed in -next. Ok, I won't worry about it then. Thanks, Linus