From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A523C43381 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 657F221841 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.b="OncmcNOd" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 657F221841 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zx2c4.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id e12f179c; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 72f9bf96 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 01672002 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 8540ce6f for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:26:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; s=mail; bh=Xex3SQaaahrOERcHIrQVJ2SXzrU=; b=OncmcN OdDGNN4OceySYWurFi9J4yOGv8m2UUFooxVZsGGjqSRMkK8gSQ0RaJ4VgnJrwSLD wUBFPprb75Bh+Osn72PELL6XWswhF9xox6EiwvBSL3fHZu7YeOJMS7S/hzhyHrhI SIkcgxV0lxxg2fpeJV24M1teYrhA1f7FZ8yYNKkZ1CPjEuqNX/SzEIGPd0nrLUoJ kNbEniChCK/sxs0ixscdcd0JDbC3CXHnJe9il9cIW+TdPhDJ2HVoFQbSI0WobaGm +xgZIeFi95SMndzH2TvB8+2vH95zXnu3N18Dapz2z5HIQojX+nckEuDb9K9Qc1cS aB8l0Gx18+2Gf9hw== Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 07de1371 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f169.google.com with SMTP id t206so2635682oib.3 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:48:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUDqfwjjnZWe6Vb4z4N+REpsP0lv+TYZOA+Myrb+x792MCJNdIZ 4wtKYM0gOGBvJGZF2E0C8f0f+NKJ4HyXDjcsvhQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyplFNHipdYX9IxFB7pddeDGSuSjJn+5UkL30muO2P6XM4r1VfB2VcBZVMTyel8jTB1DAI+xknq5mcL3pqF8GM= X-Received: by 2002:aca:61c4:: with SMTP id v187mr2866381oib.122.1553284115087; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:48:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:48:23 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: TestFlight is no longer accepting testers ... new link needed? To: member graysky Cc: WireGuard mailing list X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5504990721515357839==" Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" --===============5504990721515357839== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ea49da0584b423b7" --000000000000ea49da0584b423b7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Apple took it down because the required device capability key conflicted with an iPad in their test flight program, at exactly the same time the main version was approved for the store. Interestingly the required device capability key contained an erroneous entry "armv7", which we don't actually require. So that's trivial to remediate, and the fix is already in the repo. But it is interesting this was explicitly flagged for the first time as part of their test program: does that mean they're working on a new iPad chip that is armv8-only? It wouldn't surprise me. On Fri, Mar 22, 2019, 13:25 John wrote: > Is TestFlight for the iOS app no longer active? Looking to get the > latest build of the iOS client in hopes it is more robust for me (I > see 0.0.20190319-5 a few days ago). > --000000000000ea49da0584b423b7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Apple took it dow= n because the required device capability key conflicted with an iPad in the= ir test flight program, at exactly the same time the main version was appro= ved for the store. Interestingly the required device capability key contain= ed an erroneous entry "armv7", which we don't actually requir= e. So that's trivial to remediate, and the fix is already in the repo. = But it is interesting this was explicitly flagged for the first time as par= t of their test program: does that mean they're working on a new iPad c= hip that is armv8-only? It wouldn't surprise me.

On Fri, Mar 22, 2= 019, 13:25 John <graysky@archlinux.us> wrote:
Is TestFlight for the iOS app no longer active?=C2= =A0 Looking to get the
latest build of the iOS client in hopes it is more robust for me (I
see 0.0.20190319-5 a few days ago).
--000000000000ea49da0584b423b7-- --===============5504990721515357839== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard --===============5504990721515357839==--