From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752545AbbKHO5g (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2015 09:57:36 -0500 Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com ([192.95.5.64]:38141 "EHLO frisell.zx2c4.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751455AbbKHO5c (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2015 09:57:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151108105710.GA30282@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20151108105710.GA30282@gondor.apana.org.au> Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 15:57:24 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: GSO with udp_tunnel_xmit_skb From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" To: Herbert Xu Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=C5=BBenczykowski?= , Tom Herbert , Jiri Benc , Netdev , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > UDP carries no ordering information so this doesn't work. But if there's no ordering information, what's the problem? Isn't it good enough to send the packets in the order they were sendto()d? Or in any order at all?