From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751356AbdAPOuu (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 09:50:50 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f196.google.com ([209.85.220.196]:33774 "EHLO mail-qk0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751053AbdAPOuq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 09:50:46 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:50:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Is PWM subsystem maintainable? To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Thierry Reding , Linus Torvalds , Mika Westerberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! I'm really puzzled. Do we have a maintainer for PWM subsystem? Is he responsive? We sent already two series (1 + 4) of patches regarding to two different drivers and not a single patch has been commented and / or applied for *months*. One more had been sent week or so ago. For our uncountable pings we didn't receive any word on what's going on. If there is any trouble with patches we would really eager to fix them. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko