From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: Synopsys Ethernet QoS Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 00:25:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2df7a6dd-1128-d1d6-bf61-891f76cf7200@synopsys.com> <20161209.103327.1742213347114742435.davem@davemloft.net> <93b73b79-36aa-56b8-f975-b890b7a48bd1@synopsys.com> <20161209.104152.1969880574279771010.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Joao Pinto , Giuseppe CAVALLARO , lars.persson@axis.com, rabin.vincent@axis.com, netdev , CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f65.google.com ([209.85.218.65]:34316 "EHLO mail-oi0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753341AbcLIWZQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 17:25:16 -0500 Received: by mail-oi0-f65.google.com with SMTP id m75so4095366oig.1 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 14:25:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20161209.104152.1969880574279771010.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:41 PM, David Miller wrote: > But one thing I am against is changing the driver name for existing > users. If an existing chip is supported by the stmmac driver for > existing users, they should still continue to use the "stmmac" driver. > > Therefore, if consolidation changes the driver module name for > existing users, then that is not a good plan at all. You have at least one supporter here. Though I jumped in to the discussion very late, not sure if everyone have time to answer to that. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko