From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: add support for extended IRQ to PCI link Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:17:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1447308882-29634-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1447308882-29634-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <5644AA63.2070205@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-yk0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:36468 "EHLO mail-yk0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754348AbbKLPRs (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:17:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5644AA63.2070205@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Sinan Kaya Cc: "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , Timur Tabi , cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 11/12/2015 4:56 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote: >>> - if (acpi_irq_balance || !link->irq.active) { >>> + if ((acpi_irq_balance || !link->irq.active) && (irq < ACPI_MAX_IRQS)) { >>> /* >> >>> - * Select the best IRQ. This is done in reverse to promote >>> - * the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15. >>> + * Select the best IRQ. This is done in reverse to >>> + * promote the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15. >> >> What was changed here? > > See your comments here. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/8/231 So, you refer to narrow commentary blocks, right? It was about *new* code, leave as is what was before your patch series. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko