From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751359AbdFYQjx (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jun 2017 12:39:53 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f194.google.com ([209.85.216.194]:34125 "EHLO mail-qt0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751157AbdFYQju (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jun 2017 12:39:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1498150704-21777-1-git-send-email-yesipov@gmail.com> References: <1498150704-21777-1-git-send-email-yesipov@gmail.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 19:39:48 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: ds3232: add temperature support To: Kirill Esipov Cc: Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Kirill Esipov wrote: > DS3232/DS3234 has the temperature registers with a resolution of 0.25 > degree celsius. This enables to get the value through hwmon. > > # cat /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon0/temp1_input > 37250 > +config RTC_DRV_DS3232_HWMON > + bool "HWMON support for Dallas/Maxim DS3232/DS3234" > + depends on RTC_DRV_DS3232 && HWMON > + depends on !(RTC_DRV_DS3232=y && HWMON=m) Perhaps it might be squeezed into one line (something like that logic has been required by I2C related PMIC IIRC) > + default y Is it really sane default? > +#ifdef CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS3232_HWMON IS_BUILTIN() ? > +static int ds3232_hwmon_read_temp(struct device *dev, long int *mC) > +{ > + struct ds3232 *ds3232 = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + u8 temp_buf[2]; > + s16 temp; > + int ret; > + > + ret = regmap_bulk_read(ds3232->regmap, DS3232_REG_TEMPERATURE, temp_buf, > + sizeof(temp_buf)); > + Remove. > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > +static umode_t ds3232_hwmon_is_visible(const void *data, > + enum hwmon_sensor_types type, > + u32 attr, int channel) > +{ > + if (type != hwmon_temp) > + return 0; > + > + switch (attr) { > + case hwmon_temp_input: > + return 0444; > + default: > + return 0; > + } > +} > + > +static int ds3232_hwmon_read(struct device *dev, > + enum hwmon_sensor_types type, > + u32 attr, int channel, long *temp) > +{ > + int err; > + > + switch (attr) { > + case hwmon_temp_input: > + ds3232_hwmon_read_temp(dev, temp); > + err = 0; > + break; > + default: > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + } > + > + return err; You may do as in previous function. Or what did you mean here by introducing an err variable? > +} > + > + Remove one of them. > +static void ds3232_hwmon_register(struct device *dev, const char *name) > +{ > + struct ds3232 *ds3232 = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + struct device *hwmon_dev; > + > + hwmon_dev = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info(dev, name, ds3232, > + &ds3232_hwmon_chip_info, > + NULL); > + Remove. > + if (IS_ERR(hwmon_dev)) { > + dev_warn(dev, "unable to register hwmon device %ld\n", > + PTR_ERR(hwmon_dev)); > + } > +} > + > +#else I dunno which style is preferred, though you may use if (IS_BUILTIN(...)) return; at the beginning of the function and allow gcc optimizer to take care of everything else. > + > +static void ds3232_hwmon_register(struct device *dev, const char *name) > +{ > +} > + > +#endif -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko