Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Nikolaus Voss
<nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de> wrote:
> struct i2c_device_id argument of probe() is not used, so use probe_new()
> instead.
>

This makes...

>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, st_accel_id_table);

...this table obsolete IIUC. At least that's what I did when switched
to ->probe_new() in some drivers.

If I'm mistaken (again? :-) ) I would hear from someone to point me
how it can be used after a switch.

>
> -static int st_accel_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> -                                               const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +static int st_accel_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  {
>         struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>         struct st_sensor_data *adata;
> @@ -182,7 +181,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver st_accel_driver = {
>                 .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(st_accel_of_match),
>                 .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(st_accel_acpi_match),
>         },
> -       .probe = st_accel_i2c_probe,
> +       .probe_new = st_accel_i2c_probe,
>         .remove = st_accel_i2c_remove,
>         .id_table = st_accel_id_table,
>  };
> --
> 2.17.1
>



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko