From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CC9C433B4 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 14:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11F861176 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 14:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234806AbhEFOcR (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2021 10:32:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47778 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234002AbhEFOcQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2021 10:32:16 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01CB3C061574; Thu, 6 May 2021 07:31:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id v20so3481756plo.10; Thu, 06 May 2021 07:31:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PfMG85y3NNkF3WR1u0K030EwBkIRCcwJqZ68DfA6EiE=; b=oMUbgL1lJ9crD6AA9lazwUC5aUdIoXgU5Q0AhOoj+EDntIuhnEfIN/Tvs0ghlDHUe5 2ySsiLg0CyBRgdEgq5JmPZTpYI+6dTllH1blAIO/g8Ec6A7nNLgXEMlRbetPxuXdBKOP /C0Kp2PdJuBDNVUGxn810o+bIJFRPfZRLh1mKknrqbeUBU7OZk6uvd32uZcmiQZZ5DBP ThVlc8R++6Qq9fc+uckPDLyHKiro65JyioT7AEpZoooiSzNByvaxLwhzZP9+zbcwrz1U upU9AHNgvAyjE+asZEtIZsbKPDhZzFGMoh1/8gTpQn8JVfTmaxFw0pkfSSu1KZyRSzSe 9mzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PfMG85y3NNkF3WR1u0K030EwBkIRCcwJqZ68DfA6EiE=; b=BL9CPzJ/BIW9hDW08oNqKWTz4FATWfbX6g+Iu7z/PG+py4rZxOooF7EXEm2z+iMl9d tcrxhfTUFkAbUymGEJTbyXBwtCnw652t7/phFmU/FWgnDAoN06cCTFhQcALjPTUmDXN1 73RcScFrBVX06RYF5CsXfIavFa3kTYQg83qD2MXEMZoWHVEFJwEve0fhnT0vnH/HZRcg FriNDQ0fzDcnErRq1HrzY9dpFQ1LHKBtUmooH70+UpYm0y5LVApBKSHxDxi9TN0gYB3C 5zt4AZgx5y+E3LBqun/Tj/XnjwuY5VAmdtzjrgAR6muW3MgspYoFWiSPsJtDHscZaJIL Ma3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531awEt1ARV8LlEko4IaQMYWdjiLEEhkrf6dWNTZ4/rYuudWrjhO gyR2RrwjjINgBeSmiaW4neu6GbxDr2qfLGGrIxs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJweQkAs2pF5EkdRD/+LHDXyW/4Ghso4VXQL2BICZIGHgyJmv+85bftu5ZEzKHvUJAmFaV1vbdkD3KwGzv7VpRA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a406:b029:e6:78c4:71c8 with SMTP id p6-20020a170902a406b02900e678c471c8mr4569392plq.17.1620311477576; Thu, 06 May 2021 07:31:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210506034332.752263-1-linux@roeck-us.net> <20210506133754.GA2266661@roeck-us.net> <768c06ff-663c-eacb-fd3c-628b4e4ba449@redhat.com> <20210506135052.GB2267050@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <20210506135052.GB2267050@roeck-us.net> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 17:31:01 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: bme680_i2c: Remove ACPI support To: Guenter Roeck , Joe Perches Cc: Hans de Goede , Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio , Linux Kernel Mailing List , kernel test robot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 4:50 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 03:42:08PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > On 5/6/21 3:37 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: ... > > We (mostly Andy and me) are not even 100% sure this one is > > a fake ACPI ID, but we do pretty strongly believe that it is. > > > > What a mess :-( What we can do is a checkpatch-alike check for vendor ID to be registered in [1] and issue a warning if not. At least it alerts maintainers. Joe, do you think it is doable or we should have a separate tool for that? (Because I have no clue how checkpatch cohabits with internet connection, otherwise the problem with synchronisation of that registry might be a problem) [1]: https://uefi.org/PNP_ACPI_Registry -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko