From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751763AbdFIPse (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2017 11:48:34 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f196.google.com ([209.85.216.196]:34177 "EHLO mail-qt0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751633AbdFIPsc (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2017 11:48:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1494316248-24052-1-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> <1494316248-24052-7-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 18:48:30 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add a more accurate baud rate calculation method To: "A.S. Dong" Cc: "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm Mailing List , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Andy Duan , Stefan Agner , Mingkai Hu , "Y.B. Lu" , Dong Aisheng Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 5:20 PM, A.S. Dong wrote: >> > How about you send a separate baud algorithm improvement patch later? >> >> Why not to do it right a way? >> > > Because I thought that could be a separate patch which is doing algorithm > improvement, then we can have the full history and a clear comparison. > > And also we are still not sure whether it works, we don't want to block on it > too long. > > But if you're pretty sure about it, I would wait for some more time. > > However, personally I would still rather keep them in two separate Patches > for clearer history and comparison. Since we already near to -rc5, I would rather agree with you. So, please proceed with your approach and we can modify it in relaxing mode later on. Thanks, and sorry for the delay! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com (Andy Shevchenko) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 18:48:30 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add a more accurate baud rate calculation method In-Reply-To: References: <1494316248-24052-1-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> <1494316248-24052-7-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 5:20 PM, A.S. Dong wrote: >> > How about you send a separate baud algorithm improvement patch later? >> >> Why not to do it right a way? >> > > Because I thought that could be a separate patch which is doing algorithm > improvement, then we can have the full history and a clear comparison. > > And also we are still not sure whether it works, we don't want to block on it > too long. > > But if you're pretty sure about it, I would wait for some more time. > > However, personally I would still rather keep them in two separate Patches > for clearer history and comparison. Since we already near to -rc5, I would rather agree with you. So, please proceed with your approach and we can modify it in relaxing mode later on. Thanks, and sorry for the delay! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko