From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751464AbeFAKSc (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2018 06:18:32 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f193.google.com ([209.85.216.193]:43287 "EHLO mail-qt0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750795AbeFAKSa (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2018 06:18:30 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKILCfikNqm5qWuhUczTm11jLyzzXKgrhnqiMhJsp4MqWnkci3arZtObJIzs8KOMgFGqGmwQggvJ9lhR9yc+jTg= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180601004233.37822-6-keescook@chromium.org> References: <20180601004233.37822-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20180601004233.37822-6-keescook@chromium.org> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 13:18:29 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/16] lib: overflow: Add memory allocation overflow tests To: Kees Cook Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Linus Torvalds , Rasmus Villemoes , Matthew Wilcox , LKML , Linux-MM , Kernel Hardening Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > Make sure that the memory allocators are behaving as expected in the face > of overflows. > #include > #include > #include > +#include > +#include > +#include A nit, can we keep it in order? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko