From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:33:44 +0300 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 3/8] x86: slimbootloader: Add memory configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 7:41 AM Park, Aiden wrote: > > Slim Bootloader provides memory map info thru its HOB list pointer. > Configure memory size and relocation memory from the HOB data, and > provide e820 entries as well. > - Get memory size from the memory map info hob > - Set ram top for U-Boot relocation lower than 4GB > - Provide e820 entries from the memory map info hob > +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/slimbootloader/dram.c sdram.c is more common name in the sources AFAICS. > +ulong board_get_usable_ram_top(ulong total_size) > +{ > + struct memory_map_info *data = NULL; > + int i = 0; > + phys_addr_t addr_start = 0; > + phys_addr_t addr_end = 0; Unnecessary assignments (check entire series for them). > + data = (struct memory_map_info *)get_memory_map_info(); Casting from / to void * is redundant. Check entire series. > + if (!data) > + panic("memory map info hob not found\n"); > + /** > + * sorted memory map entries from Slim Bootloader based on physical > + * start memory address, from low to high. So do reversed search to > + * get highest usable, suitable size, 4KB aligned available memory > + * under 4GB. > + */ > + for (i = data->count - 1; i >= 0; i--) { Hmm... Maybe i = data->count; while (i--) { ... } Easier to read. > + if (data->entry[i].type != E820_RAM) > + continue; > + > + addr_start = data->entry[i].addr; > + addr_end = addr_start + data->entry[i].size; > + > + if (addr_start > SZ_4G) > + continue; > + > + if (addr_end > SZ_4G) > + addr_end = SZ_4G; > + > + if (addr_end < total_size) > + continue; > + > + /* to relocate u-boot at 4K aligned memory */ u-boot -> U-Boot > + addr_end = rounddown(addr_end - total_size, SZ_4K); > + if (addr_end >= addr_start) { > + ram_top = (ulong)addr_end + total_size; > + break; > + } > + } > + > + if (!ram_top) > + panic("failed to find available memory for relocation!"); > + > + return ram_top; > +} > + > +/** > + * The memory initialization has already been done in previous Slim Bootloader > + * stage thru FSP-M. Instead, this sets the ram_size from the memory map info > + * hob. > + */ > +int dram_init(void) > +{ > + struct memory_map_info *data = NULL; > + int i = 0; > + phys_size_t ram_size = 0; > + > + data = (struct memory_map_info *)get_memory_map_info(); > + if (!data) > + panic("memory map info hob not found\n"); > + > + /** > + * sorted memory map entries from Slim Bootloader based on physical > + * start memory address, from low to high. So do reversed search to > + * simply get highest usable memory address as ram size > + */ > + for (i = data->count - 1; i >= 0; i--) { > + if (data->entry[i].type != E820_RAM) > + continue; Second time? Perhaps you may do rather macro: #define for_each_map_info_entry_reversed(...) \ for () \ if (!cond) {} else > + > + /* simply use the highest usable memory address as ram size */ ram -> RAM > + ram_size = data->entry[i].addr + data->entry[i].size; > + break; > + } > + > + if (!ram_size) > + panic("failed to detect memory size"); > + > + gd->ram_size = ram_size; > + return 0; > +} > +int dram_init_banksize(void) > +{ > + /* simply use a single bank to have whole size for now */ > + if (CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS) { if (!foo) might be slightly better if ever this code gets modified. > + gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start = 0; > + gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size = gd->ram_size; > + } > + return 0; > +} > +#define LOADER_MEMORY_MAP_INFO_GUID \ > + { \ > + 0xa1ff7424, 0x7a1a, 0x478e, \ > + { 0xa9, 0xe4, 0x92, 0xf3, 0x57, 0xd1, 0x28, 0x32 } \ > + } EFI_GUID() ? > +/** > + * A single entry of memory map information > + * > + * @addr: start address of a memory map entry > + * @size: size of a memory map entry > + * @type: usable:1, reserved:2, acpi:3, nvs:4, unusable:5 > + * @flag: only used in Slim Bootloader > + * @rsvd: padding for alignment > + */ > +struct memory_map_entry { > + phys_addr_t addr; > + phys_size_t size; This is comes from hardware, isn't it? Probably better to use fixed width typo > + u8 type; > + u8 flag; > + u8 rsvd[6]; > +} __packed; -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko