From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755545Ab1HRLLZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:11:25 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:38413 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752123Ab1HRLLY (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:11:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110818103441.GX16790@intel.com> References: <20110817121914.GW16790@intel.com> <20110818103441.GX16790@intel.com> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:11:23 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: add functions to enable/disable aggressive clock gating From: Andy Shevchenko To: Mika Westerberg Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cjb@laptop.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > I'll prepare a new series which uses mmc_host_clk_{ungate|gate}(). Mika, do the patches to check host->clock in (mmc|sdhci)_set_data_timeout() become useless after? If so, probably you could revert them as well. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko