From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 15:56:15 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: ov02a10: fix an uninitialized return
Message-Id: <CAHp75Vftvtn4DhOU73w7hgOYpw9pJbJCJ0dSW6wUrQHA5HMn-A@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <X84nbdgv0a/ak2ef@mwanda>
In-Reply-To: <X84nbdgv0a/ak2ef@mwanda>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org

+Cc: some people who involved in different kernel source checkers

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:19 PM Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 04:00:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The "ret" variable isn't set on the no-op path where we are setting to
> > on/off and it's in the on or off state already.
> >
> > Fixes: 91807efbe8ec ("media: i2c: add OV02A10 image sensor driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> This issue has been fixed by another patch here:
>
> <URL:https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20201204082037.1658297-1-arnd@kernel.org/>

This has been reported by 3 or 4 different people. I'm wondering if
it's possible to introduce a common database to somehow reduce the
amount of patches against the same findings.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko