From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1972C43333 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F2B212CC for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Skn7flJS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727175AbgCTVw5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:52:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:46201 "EHLO mail-pf1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726666AbgCTVw5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:52:57 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id c19so3965104pfo.13; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:52:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a04BEXBq6T16pF8YgWqXF8qeXZZehjOHDxhsKaZX814=; b=Skn7flJSlYGzwEVidWCfP5Sxs1un6UzXQtQz+bWdWoAKNnRM80PqPvhDZwvv2wJKw6 Mj81HfQM/zfiGt9ileOkKRRQWiF7jWjG6JhV+9WIbVnMz/dnDuFUHCHtIbQX4/CY7DkK noOtt/A9DKzcRzAlH+RqcMdMCY2dyTdaWE9AE5cShMSjs4HBzANhTM2+7CpxOlPpNBsU 9nhE6/1XKN4/0cmtxXDNEwjoXngQLqF8QiIUQVIm1NRPbQReCnfpG/6XbUusceYyN0mz qR1CBCi2y2i3OXLUvaPOWqAKkvUGIR4nJ+prrBs7mnq20vlj/y21DMR6IS0a4SS96qyg vOYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a04BEXBq6T16pF8YgWqXF8qeXZZehjOHDxhsKaZX814=; b=osqubrMHaroAdX2xmT5TcDKYfdmAD2rMkehhh4Gjs6SU9CAVegfxsZ/rvJVGVvKVFz Bp/ePrg74/IzI2RMVmLRIumo6AhN55yNnBupg84Yka97VGX+Ju6Qc+hSuJn3CaeNUmZb NWABF2Df3o+Qu6Om8CCwyr7I/1tp0/Qz0grX/AHAFaS6J1+eL72L8PQ+La7TCzwricRJ tRpnhaEkAG71W9VCt9IZr2oN0wnK4hGC7yhIX6UZyu3QTvZtlRVSClNYoH4zp4ZHbaQe rnoAjskCtXhlg5ee4Wc/mya6JnqCmro/bbfv+OzrnQjdbfEoLD0ATwp3+t3z6HLJmvQB VK1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0PnxycUN+1pg4nT0yArAW59uWKknhE+IZQ1BEByRakKPx41L48 mMNWjfI7jzf2fsAQ425fXk55KAHoHQiix6AltUE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsmV5czmNKtoJg0C7AeN7wX4S5Al3MMjqsDaMzJBp9Kh1vmxFKQ2VcZyX/I27EONEdC3cCFyRbcSUnbF2ixLdU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2b4:: with SMTP id q20mr178775pfs.36.1584741173473; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:52:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200320131345.635023594@linutronix.de> <20200320131509.564059710@linutronix.de> <87eetmpy56.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <87eetmpy56.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:52:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Gross , Tony Luck , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Linux PM , Srinivas Pandruvada , Len Brown , Paolo Bonzini , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Platform Driver , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui , Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria , Chanwoo Choi , Jacob Pan , Adrian Hunter , Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai , ALSA Development Mailing List , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , linux-crypto Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-hwmon-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:30 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Andy Shevchenko writes: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 9, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 13, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 3, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 4, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > > > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), > > > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), > > > > Perhaps use names instead of 6 and 15? > > Thought about that and did not come up with anyting useful. FAM6 vs. 6 > is not really any better Hmm... Do we have family 15 for Intel? Perhaps I missed something... Or is it for any family? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:52:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20200320131345.635023594@linutronix.de> <20200320131509.564059710@linutronix.de> <87eetmpy56.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87eetmpy56.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Gross , Tony Luck , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Linux PM , Srinivas Pandruvada , Len Brown , Paolo Bonzini , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Platform Driver , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck linux List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:30 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Andy Shevchenko writes: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 9, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 13, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 3, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 4, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > > > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), > > > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), > > > > Perhaps use names instead of 6 and 15? > > Thought about that and did not come up with anyting useful. FAM6 vs. 6 > is not really any better Hmm... Do we have family 15 for Intel? Perhaps I missed something... Or is it for any family? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19429C4332B for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9428920735 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="WzP4BDN5"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Skn7flJS" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9428920735 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6C001673; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:55:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz E6C001673 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1584971803; bh=iJ/Y3g82q9mlsVKG/178vxEbogcfUtUVqfxCpK3SSsw=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=WzP4BDN5yoPymScNCE6rnlLO68BczPct0ieLY7g06ii2EFBQdIztydx+50D42bs40 yhM652QcWW3/GslY4RHCkKvvES9wiOgRqoqf8JCJtIJyBcv35xaTy8dvtWM5Ye2Iac bHsSJPiCRM0514UeUJ4Y8iGdlXJnuySpa81dDWe4= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADB6F80305; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:47:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 822ABF8015B; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 22:53:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com (mail-pf1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B7B8F80126 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 22:52:55 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 2B7B8F80126 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Skn7flJS" Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id c19so3965113pfo.13 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:52:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a04BEXBq6T16pF8YgWqXF8qeXZZehjOHDxhsKaZX814=; b=Skn7flJSlYGzwEVidWCfP5Sxs1un6UzXQtQz+bWdWoAKNnRM80PqPvhDZwvv2wJKw6 Mj81HfQM/zfiGt9ileOkKRRQWiF7jWjG6JhV+9WIbVnMz/dnDuFUHCHtIbQX4/CY7DkK noOtt/A9DKzcRzAlH+RqcMdMCY2dyTdaWE9AE5cShMSjs4HBzANhTM2+7CpxOlPpNBsU 9nhE6/1XKN4/0cmtxXDNEwjoXngQLqF8QiIUQVIm1NRPbQReCnfpG/6XbUusceYyN0mz qR1CBCi2y2i3OXLUvaPOWqAKkvUGIR4nJ+prrBs7mnq20vlj/y21DMR6IS0a4SS96qyg vOYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a04BEXBq6T16pF8YgWqXF8qeXZZehjOHDxhsKaZX814=; b=pNB2+vnCJqv6NGbTtWBCHfCsWXz3DbB6tc1f5vhaBZIUTg09i+Kk1ZjQ9FFjc2MTqQ Q+uHRUB8wb2zh0AnKpEKrExm2B1dgZPg0ipCOGxTb3VQOAscH6/8tHVvfr0PbHsYu8qv 6vm1yUCJtzb+V2F9/2yMmeXkZS2osSfj3B0XwvwtCRx5GaCrdC2391JPvTOgccZsERXZ uQ+QzwzpnRQN9aTK02qAMxx+8pH7dr0dYkKBdSRcNLaxjA4X2iDCx/xMaN5cTkqA6/9G EaLr5pvY35tv4IBJ8K+w1XkZLaZAhFJLQQoxRvp67C6FgUP4+IWG9PU2ipRno3MA6HK4 Rn1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ17ynadSaF/v9TdrZg7sCT9DKg/Pn4BJT9+PYbgIpjq6P/O9c5j UYypbHClDxQbb1gNwiZbfjX/OVaFQo7qjUawCj0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsmV5czmNKtoJg0C7AeN7wX4S5Al3MMjqsDaMzJBp9Kh1vmxFKQ2VcZyX/I27EONEdC3cCFyRbcSUnbF2ixLdU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2b4:: with SMTP id q20mr178775pfs.36.1584741173473; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:52:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200320131345.635023594@linutronix.de> <20200320131509.564059710@linutronix.de> <87eetmpy56.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <87eetmpy56.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:52:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros To: Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:47:37 +0100 Cc: Ulf Hansson , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)" , Viresh Kumar , ALSA Development Mailing List , Platform Driver , Jacob Pan , Srinivas Pandruvada , Amit Kucheria , Mark Gross , Herbert Xu , Chanwoo Choi , Daniel Lezcano , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart , Zhang Rui , Guenter Roeck , Len Brown , Jean Delvare , Linux PM , linux-mmc , Bjorn Helgaas , Takashi Iwai , Adrian Hunter , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , linux-crypto , Paolo Bonzini , "David S. Miller" , Andy Shevchenko X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:30 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Andy Shevchenko writes: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 9, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, 13, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 3, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 15, 4, X86_FEATURE_EST, NULL), > > > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), > > > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0x8, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, 0xb, 0), > >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 15, 0x2, 0), > > > > Perhaps use names instead of 6 and 15? > > Thought about that and did not come up with anyting useful. FAM6 vs. 6 > is not really any better Hmm... Do we have family 15 for Intel? Perhaps I missed something... Or is it for any family? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko