From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3666EC2D0EC for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 22:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C05C2063A for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 22:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="gz444vhA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726484AbgDGWbP (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:31:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f67.google.com ([209.85.216.67]:50793 "EHLO mail-pj1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726406AbgDGWbO (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:31:14 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f67.google.com with SMTP id b7so217002pju.0 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 15:31:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=w44VJtl16qHNkWkqplH4KRD3jsqhKvrC7qlIBo2fGY0=; b=gz444vhAbYuQ2rwWXgbT3tAmEp6Q4FD8q2H4HadzmJ+f7Rnl+FSlmoHrMD9snN/UZ5 yU4CBguJ4Ea2QfELx2EOGlPAtY7JEhbAPpP2yKtwsbQ9Fp80yfXrPFscbYI3Dl4GBJ64 1Oj/v2bP7TFNa5pCZT40cjYLo9s/qLI0tb03VX8TWaxfvZHCmseVEP80rTlMEEARlKV9 rOAauFtJvQEzZqAWgUJlXnhH0cd4K07Cv8tmKFBO22XibYHs9xa+zmgqkjplCGqn2Dir e7xMXi49+8TkCS2ZvIh9sy5XPgEba78lPS3dlEnAmTnpTny4Qc8Y2H9dKk4sOQxld272 u0fA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w44VJtl16qHNkWkqplH4KRD3jsqhKvrC7qlIBo2fGY0=; b=jliDT9Y4sm4ukf4MFj/+xKCZHfi6znMVUR8Cf8pJRmsX4/jNKoNCRQMD/ILr0Riod6 55fdVBUmLOexAuq7Acz3XWy3mmo4MS4FMeKHV8XCVDQ/WhDx64TCP1nl7oekQlqkSfUp /ME3vRlf3EJy8eGwzQSJjRcGNCp1KNSjqNNtKyrn9dNFPKQjy2JRbwLgP4pmTBArl972 UdNrfweQO1C8FI8nHf3gX3jMwXEL32jacO8rbjHwnzn9NzTOS8ZOoG2Syu6aYKzO46Ux 7nlDA+bqbQjWqt6vmAYed2JIdSVXDPFF83SSb8TjGAq4/R+ArYN6EBe2+hVkZaIaHgBy t9WA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZmfJWJX/B2omX2R6UhSHz7k6JBkjAgvOIcHUenbdsDLhprlfKm Mjf0NnvDQbWnyiCI0SyX5DfLvLTh2rcyw5mJyIM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIjQ0n7reS+FFVDBxtFpI06BT9cEhBAgsZFkno4saYePMd7jNdUWDmcGQN7WTy3wy3n3h9OMKCf564GRLTAHQE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e982:: with SMTP id v2mr1715859pjy.1.1586298673972; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 15:31:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200219171225.5547-1-idryomov@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 01:31:01 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vsprintf: don't obfuscate NULL and error pointers To: Ilya Dryomov Cc: Petr Mladek , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Steven Rostedt , Randy Dunlap , Kees Cook , Sergey Senozhatsky , "Tobin C . Harding" , Rasmus Villemoes , Andy Shevchenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:45 AM Ilya Dryomov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 8:23 PM Ilya Dryomov wrote: > Hi Petr, > > Bump, as I don't see this in linux-next or other public branches. > The discussion was split between several threads, revolving around > the vision for how lib/test_printf.c should be structured, but the > fix itself wasn't disputed. > > Could you please pick it up for 5.7-rc1? If you want to restructure > the test suite before adding any new test cases, v1 doesn't have them. > Other than the test cases, the only difference between v1 and v2 is > added reviews and acks. Petr has some obstacles that prevent him to pay attention on this and actually do anything right now for Linux kernel. If Rasmus, Sergey, you and maybe others will got consensus here, I think Andrew can take it thru his tree. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko