From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXTA1-0007OC-4n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 07:30:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXTA0-0007g9-2s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 07:30:49 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]:37693) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXT9z-0007fw-OW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 07:30:48 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id g62so128563563wme.0 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 04:30:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1445361732-16257-1-git-send-email-shlomopongratz@gmail.com> <56AB9A22.7020201@codeaurora.org> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 14:30:46 +0200 Message-ID: From: Shlomo Pongratz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfcf924b9138e052c46e242 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC V5 0/9] Implement GIC-500 from GICv3 family for arm64 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , Pavel Fedin Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org --047d7bfcf924b9138e052c46e242 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tuesday, February 16, 2016, Shlomo Pongratz wrote: > > > On Tuesday, February 16, 2016, Peter Maydell > wrote: > >> On 31 January 2016 at 15:54, Shlomo Pongratz >> wrote: >> > I will do a new revision of the GICv3. >> > I needed to get a time slot from my employee in order to do the work >> and I >> > got one starting next week. >> >> Hi Shlomo; I was just wondering how you were getting on with this? >> >> I ask because now I'm getting to the end of the TrustZone stuff >> I've been working on I expect to have more time to help with >> review/code/whatever for the GICv3. So I don't want to tread on >> your toes with stuff you're working on now, but if you do find >> you don't have time to make forward progress could you let me know? >> (or if there's something you want help with do say.) >> >> thank >> -- PMM >> > > Hi, > > I just got a go ahead. > I'm reviewing all the comments and pulling latest revision. > I assume it will take a week or two. > Best regards, > > S.P. > > Hi, Working of re-basing the GICv3 I've noticed in the mailing list Pavel's patch series named "GICv3 live migration support". This patch series modifies GICv3 structures. I can see that this patch series was not merged in the latest git that I've pulled (commit 80b5d6bfc). So me question is, should I use the relevant patches in my patch series or ignore them? Best regards, S.P. --047d7bfcf924b9138e052c46e242 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday, February 16, 2016, Shlomo Pongratz <shlomopongratz@gmail.com> wrote:


On Tuesday, February 16, 2016, Peter May= dell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote= :
On 31 January 2016 at 15:54, Shlomo Pon= gratz <shlomopongratz@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will do a new revision of the GICv3.
> I needed to get a time slot from my employee in order to do the work a= nd I
> got one starting next week.

Hi Shlomo; I was just wondering how you were getting on with this?

I ask because now I'm getting to the end of the TrustZone stuff
I've been working on I expect to have more time to help with
review/code/whatever for the GICv3. So I don't want to tread on
your toes with stuff you're working on now, but if you do find
you don't have time to make forward progress could you let me know?
(or if there's something you want help with do say.)

thank
-- PMM

Hi,

I j= ust got a go ahead.
I'm reviewing all the comments and pullin= g latest revision.
I assume it will take a week or two.
Best regards,

S.P.
=C2=A0

Hi,

Working of re-basing = the GICv3 I've noticed in the mailing list Pavel's patch series nam= ed "GICv3 live migration support". This patch series modifies GIC= v3 structures. I can see that this patch series was not merged in the lates= t git that I've pulled (commit 80b5d6bfc). So me question is, should I = use the relevant patches in my patch series or ignore them?

<= /div>
Best regards,

S.P.
--047d7bfcf924b9138e052c46e242--