From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:53146 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752287Ab2DNXGB (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:06:01 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20120411231102.GA6404@kroah.com> <20120412011313.GA23764@kroah.com> <20120412144626.GA14868@kroah.com> <20120413105746.10ffb120@stein> <20120413154216.476a02ac@stein> <20120414094137.54a7f213@stein> <20120414195559.3d5ab944@stein> <20120414232124.1ffd7ac9@stein> <20120415004714.4d729bef@stein> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:06:00 -0400 Message-ID: (sfid-20120415_010607_053200_5204A80B) Subject: Re: [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review From: Adrian Chadd To: Felipe Contreras Cc: Stefan Richter , Greg KH , Sergio Correia , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-wireless Mailing List , Sujith Manoharan , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , "John W. Linville" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Look, this is getting ridiculous. I think you're completely wrapped up in the "git" way of thinking about things. The patch can't be "dropped". It can't be "reverted". It can't be "removed". All that Linus can do is apply a reversed patch. Then Greg can sync up however he does it. You seem completely wrapped up in some misguided notion that the patch can be dropped from some series of patches. This isn't OpenWRT - you don't have a directory of a hundred-odd patches. It's a source revision system, complete with history. You don't remove a patch from an existing repository - you commit a fix. That may be a reversed version of the actual commit - but the effect is the same, the change is "reverted". It just isn't removed from the history. I think this is done and dusted. :-) Adrian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Chadd Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:06:00 -0400 Subject: [ath9k-devel] [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review In-Reply-To: References: <20120411231102.GA6404@kroah.com> <20120412011313.GA23764@kroah.com> <20120412144626.GA14868@kroah.com> <20120413105746.10ffb120@stein> <20120413154216.476a02ac@stein> <20120414094137.54a7f213@stein> <20120414195559.3d5ab944@stein> <20120414232124.1ffd7ac9@stein> <20120415004714.4d729bef@stein> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Look, this is getting ridiculous. I think you're completely wrapped up in the "git" way of thinking about things. The patch can't be "dropped". It can't be "reverted". It can't be "removed". All that Linus can do is apply a reversed patch. Then Greg can sync up however he does it. You seem completely wrapped up in some misguided notion that the patch can be dropped from some series of patches. This isn't OpenWRT - you don't have a directory of a hundred-odd patches. It's a source revision system, complete with history. You don't remove a patch from an existing repository - you commit a fix. That may be a reversed version of the actual commit - but the effect is the same, the change is "reverted". It just isn't removed from the history. I think this is done and dusted. :-) Adrian