From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:43840 "EHLO mail-wg0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750803Ab3DJFhI (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:37:08 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id a12so70374wgh.33 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 22:37:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1365561451.4973.YahooMailNeo@web193504.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> References: <515A0847.7000306@gmail.com> <1365088789.89181.YahooMailNeo@web193504.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365131280.68622.YahooMailNeo@web193506.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365148844.61162.YahooMailNeo@web193503.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365152761.13005.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <20830.46610.23754.783231@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1365175482.75704.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365346495.79596.YahooMailNeo@web193506.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365413949.24195.YahooMailNeo@web193502.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365433751.96373.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365561451.4973.YahooMailNeo@web193504.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 22:37:05 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20130410_073715_547805_A15F3E5D) Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior From: Adrian Chadd To: sandeep suresh Cc: Sujith Manoharan , ath9k-devel , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Right, but same deal - if it asserts the line, it should stomp wifi transmission in your particular scheme. adrian On 9 April 2013 19:37, sandeep suresh wrote: > Hello Mr.Adrian, > Thanks for your response. During googling, I had come across the > following 2-wire coexistence solution from owl modules. > > http://support.connectblue.com/display/PRODWLAN/cB-OWL22x+Bluetooth+co-existence+application+note > According to this application note, for 2-wire coexistence, WLAN_ACTIVE and > BT_PRIORITY signals are used rather than WLAN_ACTIVE and BT_ACTIVE. What is > your opinion on this? And as I understand owl modules are based on Atheros > chipsets. > > Regards > Sandeep. > > From: Adrian Chadd > To: sandeep suresh > Cc: Sujith Manoharan ; ath9k-devel > ; "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2013 4:30 AM > > Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior > > Hi, > > Yes, "WLAN_ACTIVE" here is just both TX and RX activity. > > So if it were working, that would stay low. > > > > adrian > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Chadd Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 22:37:05 -0700 Subject: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior In-Reply-To: <1365561451.4973.YahooMailNeo@web193504.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> References: <515A0847.7000306@gmail.com> <1365088789.89181.YahooMailNeo@web193504.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365131280.68622.YahooMailNeo@web193506.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365148844.61162.YahooMailNeo@web193503.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365152761.13005.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <20830.46610.23754.783231@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1365175482.75704.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365346495.79596.YahooMailNeo@web193506.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365413949.24195.YahooMailNeo@web193502.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365433751.96373.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365561451.4973.YahooMailNeo@web193504.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Right, but same deal - if it asserts the line, it should stomp wifi transmission in your particular scheme. adrian On 9 April 2013 19:37, sandeep suresh wrote: > Hello Mr.Adrian, > Thanks for your response. During googling, I had come across the > following 2-wire coexistence solution from owl modules. > > http://support.connectblue.com/display/PRODWLAN/cB-OWL22x+Bluetooth+co-existence+application+note > According to this application note, for 2-wire coexistence, WLAN_ACTIVE and > BT_PRIORITY signals are used rather than WLAN_ACTIVE and BT_ACTIVE. What is > your opinion on this? And as I understand owl modules are based on Atheros > chipsets. > > Regards > Sandeep. > > From: Adrian Chadd > To: sandeep suresh > Cc: Sujith Manoharan ; ath9k-devel > ; "linux-wireless at vger.kernel.org" > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2013 4:30 AM > > Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior > > Hi, > > Yes, "WLAN_ACTIVE" here is just both TX and RX activity. > > So if it were working, that would stay low. > > > > adrian > >