From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:45:35 -0800
Subject: [ath9k-devel] More on signal and noise
In-Reply-To: <loom.20140110T104737-871@post.gmane.org>
References: <BANLkTi=2u=Q6O6rvugMzh1mb4HNMDmGyow@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=tK74Nh+t_HErt2pmrJE4LNy0_bA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=PQ3G1gZFMO1qHTWfSzPBK+bNmKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<loom.20140110T104737-871@post.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomuLtDNz1A25hTL2ArGx-aq8kO0Tz+7W3NgPc5AT4qABA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

Look at what the NF calibration values are doing over time. rs_rssi is
calculated agains tthe noise floor, it's not an absolute signal level.


-a


On 10 January 2014 02:00, syed <liamsyed@yahoo.com> wrote:
> hi,
> I am facing problem where rs_rssi becomes less for 2.4Ghz band.
>
> Other chips beside hear it correctly.
>
> What can be possible problem.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel