From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:33:02 -0700
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Channel busy cycles
In-Reply-To: <508DADC6.9080309@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
References: <CAG6hwVP5YkBEN9vZPGGEHbK=9ow2wJJ1x_BvSQbDzUscTiOHTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-Vmokr0293M-yqQ6LvM4WKC+P0w0N2mHjpKK+rSFFjAmhwfQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5086EA9A.6030400@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
	<CAJ-Vmok-P4HQzZJu+fTfU7VsB8qU8qzhg=arSD14+cg==inw=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5086FFE3.4010108@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
	<CAJ-Vmoni5PyW=y0pQjgwJ8uF-5LniAQtnr17saQTKU3EMKeOOg@mail.gmail.com>
	<508996FF.8060003@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
	<508C34D8.9060607@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
	<CAJ-Vmok_BAjp1=M8x3gveOX7GxJiEhyPQqkR3DmtoA4e5+Wz7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<508C7342.7020906@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
	<CAJ-VmomVaiAvVC0asMB4yFSGLx-nBTbP6GB5-U6W5XrGOdL9pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<508D3A45.8060901@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
	<CAJ-Vmo=QuuOFJiWZF4-Qu5KdPcRg9NAxCC2qKA_pNfQfUguMgQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<508DADC6.9080309@mailservices.uwaterloo.ca>
Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomzawAhF0uL4GS9iR5SNOwoZCZYpxm5tt1g8h1TMh2hkg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

On 28 October 2012 15:12, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> Thanks for mentioning this. It is important to check these things, but it
> did not affect the numbers. I really suspect that some portion of frames are
> considered "busy" but not tx or rx.

Ok. Well, you could try forcing a fixed rate with definitely longer
preambles and such.

How about comparing fixed-rate 11g OFDM versus fixed-rate 11a OFDM
versus fixed-rate 11b CCK (long and short preamble) ?



Adrian