From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:60050 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753541Ab1JCL5d (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 07:57:33 -0400 Received: by gyg10 with SMTP id 10so3304031gyg.19 for ; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 04:57:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1317637758-11907-4-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> References: <1317637758-11907-1-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> <1317637758-11907-4-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:57:32 +0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20111003_135737_645084_073B7BEE) Subject: Re: [RFC 3/6] ath9k: initial radar pulse detection for DFS From: Adrian Chadd To: Zefir Kurtisi Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, kgiori@qca.qualcomm.com, rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com, nbd@openwrt.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Just out of curiousity, is there any "fast clock" on or off with the AR93xx ? (That's one of the gotchas I came across when porting DFS code to FreeBSD for the AR9160/AR9280.) Thanks, Adrian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Chadd Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:57:32 +0800 Subject: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 3/6] ath9k: initial radar pulse detection for DFS In-Reply-To: <1317637758-11907-4-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> References: <1317637758-11907-1-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> <1317637758-11907-4-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Just out of curiousity, is there any "fast clock" on or off with the AR93xx ? (That's one of the gotchas I came across when porting DFS code to FreeBSD for the AR9160/AR9280.) Thanks, Adrian