From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] bnxt_en: Use NETIF_F_GRO_HW. Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 23:06:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1512385967-32339-1-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> <1512385967-32339-3-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: David Miller , Linux Netdev List To: Michael Chan Return-path: Received: from mail-ot0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]:43075 "EHLO mail-ot0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750995AbdLDVG0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:06:26 -0500 Received: by mail-ot0-f172.google.com with SMTP id y10so15989105otg.10 for ; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 13:06:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Michael Chan wrote: > All the logic is already in these 3 drivers in the tree. You can see > the additional logic in any of these drivers. It's just that these > drivers have been using NETIF_F_GRO to turn on this mode in > hardware/firmware. What happens for tcp encaped by some udp tunnel, does the HW know how to GRO that?