From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE9BC282D7 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 21:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2F42084C for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 21:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="qXkL5XwG" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726753AbfBBVk7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2019 16:40:59 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-f193.google.com ([209.85.219.193]:38638 "EHLO mail-yb1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726609AbfBBVk6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2019 16:40:58 -0500 Received: by mail-yb1-f193.google.com with SMTP id x9so4155493ybj.5; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 13:40:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=d+xT7syqQyquYP2EXC6Yee35GC+rQ0y9DVE2VdlVFQ0=; b=qXkL5XwGQjAeLhiNO0n5BnDFF6h4UNndRJ9pf8i74pKEGJEBTMTCV9k/V/2imXlfZ3 bO4IPbt0hfHs1trsh9bHmKR/tOP3P/D6cW5zEHGFe2cF7xrwl1TxpCxGKebhxjjvM80M 8OBAsiixsWtNvGq7ZtNIGMra2xfrI1BxeJuZwnuwIYtAtvo+mKLa9r7WwLiZhw7xZWqY 8rMpBSbUuOXs7GgNAnGzN2SeeGlv3RSkH+cMeDlpFwwckMhlZCIkh9c5Q5YOi/VAFrQV 3dryW3gnrpJW1xT9he3P72e2wclhi7xlKC7kUhrUVGTxiFFigIl0VA7klp0tkZt4sOyb r8Qw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=d+xT7syqQyquYP2EXC6Yee35GC+rQ0y9DVE2VdlVFQ0=; b=nkXQ+7feoAI4LsR0nIAs/YtMf0hXB0F2xzXHqWv/eDlqy9QPeZNfpfEHwsH0dr5qIM xDUZSJQIOYTkj672VtdAoRxWi7eX75J/DtfKCPXqLuaLJbzoAXQAKDhw0yG4fVyJq+UH 4DZuQvkAnFpfC0MrECzPGsNJ3XNywRyL4XTsOYGXO7YJNZf2a/ghaQwj06q1DyTzmb+N aP1+hy1QmoKXirWxZtsf1rgqW7sWa7rgDdXP/FV/HprVggfA6UIF8z1kDhY3eCpwppb3 rLFLYkbo5ssr5fkpG/L17euQ4GKLJ8E/v6+lqo1f3qiuWCEp0RZ0b/2FhP8ToSnzf+QL YWGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdAWRKkybblBY+kpm4pFgs277iCbG1Ka8cqyDdIy6Z64UU9qoVS PuuxkF6gvxK5uyizBWjZRCUCPP7+06B6I+pd4rE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4YPS+j1AgrCviQF89I9Nx529BO5dxtP8NTE6i58aLpaP4WJhyAxbvKwyPmLHDs7NiLYSqz9kkruMo4wxRTlDQ= X-Received: by 2002:a25:aa41:: with SMTP id s59mr38062869ybi.67.1549143658124; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 13:40:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190202115054.4880-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20190202115054.4880-3-pablo@netfilter.org> In-Reply-To: From: Or Gerlitz Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 23:40:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12 net-next,v7] net/mlx5e: support for two independent packet edit actions To: Tonghao Zhang Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , Linux Kernel Network Developers , David Miller , thomas.lendacky@amd.com, Florian Fainelli , Ariel Elior , Michael Chan , santosh@chelsio.com, madalin.bucur@nxp.com, "Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" , Salil Mehta , Jeff Kirsher , Tariq Toukan , Saeed Mahameed , Jiri Pirko , Ido Schimmel , Jakub Kicinski , peppe.cavallaro@st.com, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , alexandre.torgue@st.com, joabreu@synopsys.com, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com, Ganesh Goudar , Or Gerlitz , Manish.Chopra@cavium.com, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , mkubecek@suse.cz, venkatkumar.duvvuru@broadcom.com, Julia Lawall , John Fastabend , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Healy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 5:19 PM Tonghao Zhang wrote: > The patch [1] is ready too. David may decide which one will be applied > firstly. and other is rebased ?. Your patch is for net, net-next is rebased over net > [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1032952/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12 net-next,v7] net/mlx5e: support for two independent packet edit actions Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 23:40:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20190202115054.4880-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20190202115054.4880-3-pablo@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , Linux Kernel Network Developers , David Miller , thomas.lendacky@amd.com, Florian Fainelli , Ariel Elior , Michael Chan , santosh@chelsio.com, madalin.bucur@nxp.com, "Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" , Salil Mehta , Jeff Kirsher , Tariq Toukan , Saeed Mahameed , Jiri Pirko , Ido Schimmel , Jakub Kicinski , peppe.cavallaro@st.com, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 5:19 PM Tonghao Zhang wrote: > The patch [1] is ready too. David may decide which one will be applied > firstly. and other is rebased ?. Your patch is for net, net-next is rebased over net > [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1032952/