From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [patch net-next 3/4] net: sched: convert cls_flower->egress_dev users to tc_setup_cb_egdev infra Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:47:19 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20171010073016.3682-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20171010073016.3682-4-jiri@resnulli.us> <20171010211609.GK2033@nanopsycho> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Simon Horman , Linux Netdev List , David Miller , Jamal Hadi Salim , Cong Wang , Saeed Mahameed , mlxsw To: Jiri Pirko , John Hurley Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f67.google.com ([209.85.218.67]:50436 "EHLO mail-oi0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756410AbdJJVrU (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:47:20 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f67.google.com with SMTP id q4so30052091oic.7 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20171010211609.GK2033@nanopsycho> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:08:23PM CEST, gerlitz.or@gmail.com wrote: >>On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >>> The only user of cls_flower->egress_dev is mlx5. >> >>but nfp supports decap action offload too and from the flower code >>stand point, I guess they are both the same, right? how does it work >>there? > > Apparently they don't use cls_flower->egress_dev. John, can you elaborate on that, how do you manage to get away from that practice?