From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 10/10] IB/iser: Support the remote invalidation exception Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:33:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1447691861-3796-1-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> <1447691861-3796-11-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> <564ADFCC.4030109@mellanox.com> <564AF929.60209@dev.mellanox.co.il> <564AFB93.9010602@mellanox.com> <564B00C3.1030506@dev.mellanox.co.il> <564C6347.3040501@dev.mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <564C6347.3040501@dev.mellanox.co.il> Sender: target-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: Pete Wyckoff , Or Gerlitz , Sagi Grimberg , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , target-devel@vger.kernel.org, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , Steve Wise , Jenny Derzhavetz List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: >> AFAIR, in the past there weren't explicit means to do that. >> What's makes iscsi tcp eligible to support bidi's that we don't have @ iser? > In theory, nothing. In practice, iser is missing customer demands, iser targets that > support bidi and testing... > If someone cared enough about it then I assume we'd hear about it by now... Sagi, it works in TGT and AFAIR with the initiator too. Looking on this paper of Pete Wyckoff [1] I see that he says that few changes to the initiator were needed, not sure which. Or. [1] http://pw.padd.com/papers/dalessandro-iser-snapi07.pdf