From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/4] net: sched: get rid of cls_flower->egress_dev Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:46:22 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20171010073016.3682-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20171010211357.GJ2033@nanopsycho> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Saeed Mahameed , Linux Netdev List , David Miller , Jamal Hadi Salim , Cong Wang , mlxsw To: Jiri Pirko Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]:52598 "EHLO mail-oi0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756506AbdJJVqX (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:46:23 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f44.google.com with SMTP id p126so47628014oih.9 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:46:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20171010211357.GJ2033@nanopsycho> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:24:21PM CEST, gerlitz.or@gmail.com wrote: > Or, as I replied to you earlier, the issue you describe is totally > unrelated to this patchset as you see the issue with the current net-next. Jiri, the point I wanted to make that if indeed there's a bug in mlx5 or flower, we will have to fix it for 4.14 and then these bits would have to be rebased when net-next is re-planted over net, I put "FWIW" before that, so maybe it doesn't W so much, we'll see. Or.