From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753044AbbCHVPF (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2015 17:15:05 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:40305 "EHLO mail-oi0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752312AbbCHVPD (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2015 17:15:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 23:15:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] if_link: Add VF multicast promiscuous control From: Or Gerlitz To: Jeff Kirsher Cc: "Skidmore, Donald C" , Edward Cree , Hiroshi Shimamoto , "vyasevic@redhat.com" , Alexander Duyck , =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= , "e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "Choi, Sy Jong" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , David Laight , Hayato Momma Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote: [...] > We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a > custom sysfs interface is not the way we want to handle this. We agreed > upon a generic interface so that any NIC is able to turn on or off VF > multicast promiscuous mode. Jeff, please make sure to either respond to my comments on the V2 thread (or better) address them for the V3 post. http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=142441852518152&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=142441867218183&w=2 Or.