From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] ethtool: Add actual port speed reporting Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 09:02:49 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1478100914-23610-1-git-send-email-galp@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Linux Netdev List , "John W. Linville" , Vidya Sagar Ravipati , Saeed Mahameed , David Decotigny , Ben Hutchings To: Gal Pressman Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f65.google.com ([209.85.218.65]:34165 "EHLO mail-oi0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751671AbcKCHCv (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 03:02:51 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f65.google.com with SMTP id 62so5071993oif.1 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 00:02:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1478100914-23610-1-git-send-email-galp@mellanox.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Gal Pressman wrote: > In some cases such as virtual machines and multi functions (SR-IOV), the actual > bandwidth exposed for each machine is not accurately shown in ethtool. You mean that if you rate-limit a VF from the host they will be able to actually query that and report it to their OS?