From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Andersson Subject: Re: use IORESOURCE_REG resource type for non-translatable addresses in DT Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:09:24 -0700 Message-ID: References: <53D788A7.4020303@mm-sol.com> <3794875.CZFbAag5Sv@wuerfel> <53D7AA72.6010309@mm-sol.com> <20140729234522.E9FF1C40738@trevor.secretlab.ca> <53D84558.7060406@codeaurora.org> <20140730060619.GC19933@codeaurora.org> <53FE53E1.9030605@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53FE53E1.9030605@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Rob Herring , Grant Likely , Stanimir Varbanov , Arnd Bergmann , Rob Herring , Lee Jones , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Mark Brown List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > What's Josh's original proposal? We've already punted on this for SSBI > PMICs and just required them to put registers in DT for use some day and > I don't see anyone blocking individual SPMI pmic drivers from merging > over this. So I guess I agree with you that we can move forward with the > other drivers. I'd still like to see us make this better though, so it > seems worthwhile to have the discussion and get to some conclusion. > That sounds totally reasonable, I agree that we should try to sort this out and if we do this should be applicable on pm8xxx as well(?). My concern was that further discussions would hinder the ability of actually committing the pm8x41 container driver and that is in my eyes blocking integration of drivers for the pmic blocks. Regards, Bjorn From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752621AbaH2EJ2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2014 00:09:28 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]:38527 "EHLO mail-la0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751188AbaH2EJ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2014 00:09:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <53FE53E1.9030605@codeaurora.org> References: <53D788A7.4020303@mm-sol.com> <3794875.CZFbAag5Sv@wuerfel> <53D7AA72.6010309@mm-sol.com> <20140729234522.E9FF1C40738@trevor.secretlab.ca> <53D84558.7060406@codeaurora.org> <20140730060619.GC19933@codeaurora.org> <53FE53E1.9030605@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:09:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: use IORESOURCE_REG resource type for non-translatable addresses in DT From: Bjorn Andersson To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Rob Herring , Grant Likely , Stanimir Varbanov , Arnd Bergmann , Rob Herring , Lee Jones , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Mark Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > What's Josh's original proposal? We've already punted on this for SSBI > PMICs and just required them to put registers in DT for use some day and > I don't see anyone blocking individual SPMI pmic drivers from merging > over this. So I guess I agree with you that we can move forward with the > other drivers. I'd still like to see us make this better though, so it > seems worthwhile to have the discussion and get to some conclusion. > That sounds totally reasonable, I agree that we should try to sort this out and if we do this should be applicable on pm8xxx as well(?). My concern was that further discussions would hinder the ability of actually committing the pm8x41 container driver and that is in my eyes blocking integration of drivers for the pmic blocks. Regards, Bjorn From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bjorn@kryo.se (Bjorn Andersson) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:09:24 -0700 Subject: use IORESOURCE_REG resource type for non-translatable addresses in DT In-Reply-To: <53FE53E1.9030605@codeaurora.org> References: <53D788A7.4020303@mm-sol.com> <3794875.CZFbAag5Sv@wuerfel> <53D7AA72.6010309@mm-sol.com> <20140729234522.E9FF1C40738@trevor.secretlab.ca> <53D84558.7060406@codeaurora.org> <20140730060619.GC19933@codeaurora.org> <53FE53E1.9030605@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > What's Josh's original proposal? We've already punted on this for SSBI > PMICs and just required them to put registers in DT for use some day and > I don't see anyone blocking individual SPMI pmic drivers from merging > over this. So I guess I agree with you that we can move forward with the > other drivers. I'd still like to see us make this better though, so it > seems worthwhile to have the discussion and get to some conclusion. > That sounds totally reasonable, I agree that we should try to sort this out and if we do this should be applicable on pm8xxx as well(?). My concern was that further discussions would hinder the ability of actually committing the pm8x41 container driver and that is in my eyes blocking integration of drivers for the pmic blocks. Regards, Bjorn