From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Shawn Guo Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 15:13:39 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: [linux-lvm] A couple of questions on locking library Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Teigland , Zdenek Kabelac Cc: linux-lvm@redhat.com Hi David, Zdenek, Comparing to stable-2.02 branch, I noticed that there are significant changes around locking infrastructure on master branch. I have a couple of questions regarding to these changes. 1. I see External Locking support was removed as part of clvmd removal. What's the reason for dropping External Locking support? I'm asking because we are investigating the possibility to use hardware assisted locking for cluster, in form of External Locking extension. 2. It seems there have never been real support for LV (Logic Volume) locking. On stable-2.02 branch, the LV locking interface is used as activation path instead of real locking on LV. And on master branch, activation path gets separated off from locking infrastructure. As the result, the LV interface is dropped completely from locking infrastructure. My question is why there have never been LV locking support. Is the LV locking support an invalid requirement at all? Or it's just because no one cares about it enough to add the support? Thanks for your time, and appreciate any comment you would give here. Regards, Shawn