From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:35183 "EHLO mail-io0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753468AbcAWCoZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:44:25 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 77so105991538ioc.2 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 18:44:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <56A0956B.7060706@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:44:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why is dedup inline, not delayed (as opposed to offline)? Explain like I'm five pls. From: Chris Murphy To: Al <6401e46d@opayq.com> Cc: Btrfs BTRFS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Al <6401e46d@opayq.com> wrote: > With respect Chris, if you intentionally ignore all of the other context > clues ("keep up the great work", "looking forward to using it"), you could > come to that conclusion. You'd have to try really really hard. > > I wasn't criticising your buddy in anyway, quite the opposite. Can we move > on, now? There are better ways of spending our time. We can move on anytime you like. But you're the one bringing up perceived emotional problems of others, so when you do that, your own emotional problems are completely in-scope as well. Don't like that? Then don't bring it up, just let it go next time. -- Chris Murphy