From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:35116 "EHLO mail-io0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752607AbcCGToV (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:44:21 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id g203so143505648iof.2 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 11:44:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160307084235.GB6939@torres.zugschlus.de> References: <20160227211450.GS26042@torres.zugschlus.de> <20160305143934.GE1902@torres.zugschlus.de> <20160305200909.GJ1902@torres.zugschlus.de> <20160307084235.GB6939@torres.zugschlus.de> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 12:44:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Again, no space left on device while rebalancing and recipe doesnt work From: Chris Murphy To: Marc Haber Cc: Btrfs BTRFS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Marc Haber wrote: > And this is really something to be proud of? I mean, this is a file > system that is part of the vanilla linux kernel, not marked as > experimental or something, and you're still concerned about file > systems that were made a year ago? This is a new experience for me. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/Documentation/filesystems/btrfs.txt?id=refs/tags/v4.4.4 "Btrfs is under heavy development, and is not suitable for any uses other than benchmarking and review. The Btrfs disk format is not yet finalized." I thought the 2nd sentence was removed a long time ago but I'm seeing it in the current branch and 4.1.y. Is this a bug? -- Chris Murphy