All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Add benchmark for local_storage get
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 16:00:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkYkhg2RQWJi72Eu0UOAqLGAPYm21TxQvCVC4R74TK0vqg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220604222006.3006708-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com>

Thanks for adding these benchmarks!


On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 3:20 PM Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> wrote:
>
> Add a benchmarks to demonstrate the performance cliff for local_storage
> get as the number of local_storage maps increases beyond current
> local_storage implementation's cache size.
>
> "sequential get" and "interleaved get" benchmarks are added, both of
> which do many bpf_task_storage_get calls on sets of task local_storage
> maps of various counts, while considering a single specific map to be
> 'important' and counting task_storage_gets to the important map
> separately in addition to normal 'hits' count of all gets. Goal here is
> to mimic scenario where a particular program using one map - the
> important one - is running on a system where many other local_storage
> maps exist and are accessed often.
>
> While "sequential get" benchmark does bpf_task_storage_get for map 0, 1,
> ..., {9, 99, 999} in order, "interleaved" benchmark interleaves 4
> bpf_task_storage_gets for the important map for every 10 map gets. This
> is meant to highlight performance differences when important map is
> accessed far more frequently than non-important maps.
>
> A "hashmap control" benchmark is also included for easy comparison of
> standard bpf hashmap lookup vs local_storage get. The benchmark is
> similar to "sequential get", but creates and uses BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH
> instead of local storage. Only one inner map is created - a hashmap
> meant to hold tid -> data mapping for all tasks. Size of the hashmap is
> hardcoded to my system's PID_MAX_LIMIT (4,194,304). The number of these
> keys which are actually fetched as part of the benchmark is
> configurable.
>
> Addition of this benchmark is inspired by conversation with Alexei in a
> previous patchset's thread [0], which highlighted the need for such a
> benchmark to motivate and validate improvements to local_storage
> implementation. My approach in that series focused on improving
> performance for explicitly-marked 'important' maps and was rejected
> with feedback to make more generally-applicable improvements while
> avoiding explicitly marking maps as important. Thus the benchmark
> reports both general and important-map-focused metrics, so effect of
> future work on both is clear.

The current implementation falls back to a list traversal of
bpf_local_storage->list when there is a cache miss. I wonder if this
is a place with room for optimization? Maybe a hash table or a tree
would be a more performant alternative?

>
> Regarding the benchmark results. On a powerful system (Skylake, 20
> cores, 256gb ram):
>
> Hashmap Control
> ===============
>         num keys: 10
> hashmap (control) sequential    get:  hits throughput: 33.748 ± 0.700 M ops/s, hits latency: 29.631 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 33.748 ± 0.700 M ops/s
>
>         num keys: 1000
> hashmap (control) sequential    get:  hits throughput: 29.997 ± 0.953 M ops/s, hits latency: 33.337 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 29.997 ± 0.953 M ops/s
>
>         num keys: 10000
> hashmap (control) sequential    get:  hits throughput: 22.828 ± 1.114 M ops/s, hits latency: 43.805 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 22.828 ± 1.114 M ops/s
>
>         num keys: 100000
> hashmap (control) sequential    get:  hits throughput: 17.595 ± 0.225 M ops/s, hits latency: 56.834 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 17.595 ± 0.225 M ops/s
>
>         num keys: 4194304
> hashmap (control) sequential    get:  hits throughput: 7.098 ± 0.757 M ops/s, hits latency: 140.878 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 7.098 ± 0.757 M ops/s
>
> Local Storage
> =============
>         num_maps: 1
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 47.298 ± 0.180 M ops/s, hits latency: 21.142 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 47.298 ± 0.180 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 55.277 ± 0.888 M ops/s, hits latency: 18.091 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 55.277 ± 0.888 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 10
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 40.240 ± 0.802 M ops/s, hits latency: 24.851 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 4.024 ± 0.080 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 48.701 ± 0.722 M ops/s, hits latency: 20.533 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 17.393 ± 0.258 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 16
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 44.515 ± 0.708 M ops/s, hits latency: 22.464 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 2.782 ± 0.044 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 49.553 ± 2.260 M ops/s, hits latency: 20.181 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 15.767 ± 0.719 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 17
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 38.778 ± 0.302 M ops/s, hits latency: 25.788 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 2.284 ± 0.018 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 43.848 ± 1.023 M ops/s, hits latency: 22.806 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 13.349 ± 0.311 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 24
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 19.317 ± 0.568 M ops/s, hits latency: 51.769 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 0.806 ± 0.024 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 24.397 ± 0.272 M ops/s, hits latency: 40.989 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 6.863 ± 0.077 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 32
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 13.333 ± 0.135 M ops/s, hits latency: 75.000 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 0.417 ± 0.004 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 16.898 ± 0.383 M ops/s, hits latency: 59.178 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 4.717 ± 0.107 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 100
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 6.360 ± 0.107 M ops/s, hits latency: 157.233 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 0.064 ± 0.001 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 7.303 ± 0.362 M ops/s, hits latency: 136.930 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 1.907 ± 0.094 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 1000
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 0.452 ± 0.010 M ops/s, hits latency: 2214.022 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 0.000 ± 0.000 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 0.542 ± 0.007 M ops/s, hits latency: 1843.341 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 0.136 ± 0.002 M ops/s
>
> Looking at the "sequential get" results, it's clear that as the
> number of task local_storage maps grows beyond the current cache size
> (16), there's a significant reduction in hits throughput. Note that
> current local_storage implementation assigns a cache_idx to maps as they
> are created. Since "sequential get" is creating maps 0..n in order and
> then doing bpf_task_storage_get calls in the same order, the benchmark
> is effectively ensuring that a map will not be in cache when the program
> tries to access it.
>
> For "interleaved get" results, important-map hits throughput is greatly
> increased as the important map is more likely to be in cache by virtue
> of being accessed far more frequently. Throughput still reduces as #
> maps increases, though.
>
> To get a sense of the overhead of the benchmark program, I
> commented out bpf_task_storage_get/bpf_map_lookup_elem in
> local_storage_bench.c and ran the benchmark on the same host as the
> 'real' run. Results:
>
> Hashmap Control
> ===============
>         num keys: 10
> hashmap (control) sequential    get:  hits throughput: 54.288 ± 0.655 M ops/s, hits latency: 18.420 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 54.288 ± 0.655 M ops/s
>
>         num keys: 1000
> hashmap (control) sequential    get:  hits throughput: 52.913 ± 0.519 M ops/s, hits latency: 18.899 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 52.913 ± 0.519 M ops/s
>
>         num keys: 10000
> hashmap (control) sequential    get:  hits throughput: 53.480 ± 1.235 M ops/s, hits latency: 18.699 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 53.480 ± 1.235 M ops/s
>
>         num keys: 100000
> hashmap (control) sequential    get:  hits throughput: 54.982 ± 1.902 M ops/s, hits latency: 18.188 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 54.982 ± 1.902 M ops/s
>
>         num keys: 4194304
> hashmap (control) sequential    get:  hits throughput: 50.858 ± 0.707 M ops/s, hits latency: 19.662 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 50.858 ± 0.707 M ops/s
>
> Local Storage
> =============
>         num_maps: 1
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 110.990 ± 4.828 M ops/s, hits latency: 9.010 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 110.990 ± 4.828 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 161.057 ± 4.090 M ops/s, hits latency: 6.209 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 161.057 ± 4.090 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 10
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 112.930 ± 1.079 M ops/s, hits latency: 8.855 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 11.293 ± 0.108 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 115.841 ± 2.088 M ops/s, hits latency: 8.633 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 41.372 ± 0.746 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 16
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 115.653 ± 0.416 M ops/s, hits latency: 8.647 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 7.228 ± 0.026 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 138.717 ± 1.649 M ops/s, hits latency: 7.209 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 44.137 ± 0.525 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 17
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 112.020 ± 1.649 M ops/s, hits latency: 8.927 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 6.598 ± 0.097 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 128.089 ± 1.960 M ops/s, hits latency: 7.807 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 38.995 ± 0.597 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 24
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 92.447 ± 5.170 M ops/s, hits latency: 10.817 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 3.855 ± 0.216 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 128.844 ± 2.808 M ops/s, hits latency: 7.761 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 36.245 ± 0.790 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 32
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 102.042 ± 1.462 M ops/s, hits latency: 9.800 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 3.194 ± 0.046 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 126.577 ± 1.818 M ops/s, hits latency: 7.900 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 35.332 ± 0.507 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 100
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 111.327 ± 1.401 M ops/s, hits latency: 8.983 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 1.113 ± 0.014 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 131.327 ± 1.339 M ops/s, hits latency: 7.615 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 34.302 ± 0.350 M ops/s
>
>         num_maps: 1000
> local_storage cache sequential  get:  hits throughput: 101.978 ± 0.563 M ops/s, hits latency: 9.806 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 0.102 ± 0.001 M ops/s
> local_storage cache interleaved get:  hits throughput: 141.084 ± 1.098 M ops/s, hits latency: 7.088 ns/op, important_hits throughput: 35.430 ± 0.276 M ops/s
>
> Adjusting for overhead, latency numbers for "hashmap control" and
> "sequential get" are:
>
> hashmap_control_1k:   ~14.4ns
> hashmap_control_10k:  ~25.1ns
> hashmap_control_100k: ~38.6ns
> sequential_get_1:     ~12.1ns
> sequential_get_10:    ~16.0ns
> sequential_get_16:    ~13.8ns
> sequential_get_17:    ~16.8ns
> sequential_get_24:    ~40.9ns
> sequential_get_32:    ~65.2ns
> sequential_get_100:   ~148.2ns
> sequential_get_1000:  ~2204ns
>
> Clearly demonstrating a cliff.
>
> In the discussion for v1 of this patchset, Alexei noted that
> local_storage was 2.5x faster than a large hashmap [1]. The benchmark
> results confirm that this is still the case: a long-running BPF
> application putting some pid-specific info into a hashmap for each pid
> it sees will probably see on the order of 10-100k pids. Bench numbers
> for hashmaps of this size are ~2.5x slower than sequential_get_16, but
> as the number of local_storage maps grows past local_storage cache size
> performance advantage reverses.
>
> When running the benchmarks it may be necessary to bump 'open files'
> ulimit for a successful run.
>
>   [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220420002143.1096548-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
>   [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220511173305.ftldpn23m4ski3d3@MBP-98dd607d3435.dhcp.thefacebook.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> v4 -> v5:
>   * Remove 2nd patch refactoring mean/stddev calculations (Andrii)
>   * Change "hashmap control" benchmark to use one big hashmap w/
>     configurable number of keys accessed (Andrii)
>     * Add discussion of "hashmap control" vs "sequential get" numbers
>
> v3 -> v4:
>   * Remove ifs guarding increments in measure fn (Andrii)
>   * Refactor to use 1 bpf prog for all 3 benchmarks w/ global vars set
>     from userspace before load to control behavior (Andrii)
>   * Greatly reduce variance in overhead by having benchmark bpf prog
>     loop 10k times regardless of map count (Andrii)
>     * Also, move sync_fetch_and_incr out of do_lookup as the guaranteed
>       second sync_fetch_and_incr call for num_maps = 1 was adding
>       overhead
>   * Add second patch refactoring bench.c's mean/stddev calculations
>     in reporting helper fns
>
> v2 -> v3:
>   * Accessing 1k maps in ARRAY_OF_MAPS doesn't hit MAX_USED_MAPS limit,
>     so just use 1 program (Alexei)
>
> v1 -> v2:
>   * Adopt ARRAY_OF_MAPS approach for bpf program, allowing truly
>     configurable # of maps (Andrii)
>   * Add hashmap benchmark (Alexei)
>   * Add discussion of overhead
>
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile          |   4 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c           |  55 ++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h           |   4 +
>  .../bpf/benchs/bench_local_storage.c          | 268 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../bpf/benchs/run_bench_local_storage.sh     |  24 ++
>  .../selftests/bpf/benchs/run_common.sh        |  17 ++
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage_bench.c | 104 +++++++
>  7 files changed, 475 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_local_storage.c
>  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_local_storage.sh
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage_bench.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index 2d3c8c8f558a..f82f77075f67 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)/bench_ringbufs.o: $(OUTPUT)/ringbuf_bench.skel.h \
>  $(OUTPUT)/bench_bloom_filter_map.o: $(OUTPUT)/bloom_filter_bench.skel.h
>  $(OUTPUT)/bench_bpf_loop.o: $(OUTPUT)/bpf_loop_bench.skel.h
>  $(OUTPUT)/bench_strncmp.o: $(OUTPUT)/strncmp_bench.skel.h
> +$(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage.o: $(OUTPUT)/local_storage_bench.skel.h
>  $(OUTPUT)/bench.o: bench.h testing_helpers.h $(BPFOBJ)
>  $(OUTPUT)/bench: LDLIBS += -lm
>  $(OUTPUT)/bench: $(OUTPUT)/bench.o \
> @@ -571,7 +572,8 @@ $(OUTPUT)/bench: $(OUTPUT)/bench.o \
>                  $(OUTPUT)/bench_ringbufs.o \
>                  $(OUTPUT)/bench_bloom_filter_map.o \
>                  $(OUTPUT)/bench_bpf_loop.o \
> -                $(OUTPUT)/bench_strncmp.o
> +                $(OUTPUT)/bench_strncmp.o \
> +                $(OUTPUT)/bench_local_storage.o
>         $(call msg,BINARY,,$@)
>         $(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(filter %.a %.o,$^) $(LDLIBS) -o $@
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
> index f061cc20e776..32399554f89b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,53 @@ void ops_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt)
>         printf("latency %8.3lf ns/op\n", 1000.0 / hits_mean * env.producer_cnt);
>  }
>
> +void local_storage_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res,
> +                                  long delta_ns)
> +{
> +       double important_hits_per_sec, hits_per_sec;
> +       double delta_sec = delta_ns / 1000000000.0;
> +
> +       hits_per_sec = res->hits / 1000000.0 / delta_sec;
> +       important_hits_per_sec = res->important_hits / 1000000.0 / delta_sec;
> +
> +       printf("Iter %3d (%7.3lfus): ", iter, (delta_ns - 1000000000) / 1000.0);
> +
> +       printf("hits %8.3lfM/s ", hits_per_sec);
> +       printf("important_hits %8.3lfM/s\n", important_hits_per_sec);
> +}
> +
> +void local_storage_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt)
> +{
> +       double important_hits_mean = 0.0, important_hits_stddev = 0.0;
> +       double hits_mean = 0.0, hits_stddev = 0.0;
> +       int i;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < res_cnt; i++) {
> +               hits_mean += res[i].hits / 1000000.0 / (0.0 + res_cnt);
> +               important_hits_mean += res[i].important_hits / 1000000.0 / (0.0 + res_cnt);
> +       }
> +
> +       if (res_cnt > 1)  {
> +               for (i = 0; i < res_cnt; i++) {
> +                       hits_stddev += (hits_mean - res[i].hits / 1000000.0) *
> +                                      (hits_mean - res[i].hits / 1000000.0) /
> +                                      (res_cnt - 1.0);
> +                       important_hits_stddev +=
> +                                      (important_hits_mean - res[i].important_hits / 1000000.0) *
> +                                      (important_hits_mean - res[i].important_hits / 1000000.0) /
> +                                      (res_cnt - 1.0);
> +               }
> +
> +               hits_stddev = sqrt(hits_stddev);
> +               important_hits_stddev = sqrt(important_hits_stddev);
> +       }
> +       printf("Summary: hits throughput %8.3lf \u00B1 %5.3lf M ops/s, ",
> +              hits_mean, hits_stddev);
> +       printf("hits latency %8.3lf ns/op, ", 1000.0 / hits_mean);
> +       printf("important_hits throughput %8.3lf \u00B1 %5.3lf M ops/s\n",
> +              important_hits_mean, important_hits_stddev);
> +}
> +
>  const char *argp_program_version = "benchmark";
>  const char *argp_program_bug_address = "<bpf@vger.kernel.org>";
>  const char argp_program_doc[] =
> @@ -188,12 +235,14 @@ static const struct argp_option opts[] = {
>  extern struct argp bench_ringbufs_argp;
>  extern struct argp bench_bloom_map_argp;
>  extern struct argp bench_bpf_loop_argp;
> +extern struct argp bench_local_storage_argp;
>  extern struct argp bench_strncmp_argp;
>
>  static const struct argp_child bench_parsers[] = {
>         { &bench_ringbufs_argp, 0, "Ring buffers benchmark", 0 },
>         { &bench_bloom_map_argp, 0, "Bloom filter map benchmark", 0 },
>         { &bench_bpf_loop_argp, 0, "bpf_loop helper benchmark", 0 },
> +       { &bench_local_storage_argp, 0, "local_storage benchmark", 0 },
>         { &bench_strncmp_argp, 0, "bpf_strncmp helper benchmark", 0 },
>         {},
>  };
> @@ -396,6 +445,9 @@ extern const struct bench bench_hashmap_with_bloom;
>  extern const struct bench bench_bpf_loop;
>  extern const struct bench bench_strncmp_no_helper;
>  extern const struct bench bench_strncmp_helper;
> +extern const struct bench bench_local_storage_cache_seq_get;
> +extern const struct bench bench_local_storage_cache_interleaved_get;
> +extern const struct bench bench_local_storage_cache_hashmap_control;
>
>  static const struct bench *benchs[] = {
>         &bench_count_global,
> @@ -430,6 +482,9 @@ static const struct bench *benchs[] = {
>         &bench_bpf_loop,
>         &bench_strncmp_no_helper,
>         &bench_strncmp_helper,
> +       &bench_local_storage_cache_seq_get,
> +       &bench_local_storage_cache_interleaved_get,
> +       &bench_local_storage_cache_hashmap_control,
>  };
>
>  static void setup_benchmark()
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h
> index fb3e213df3dc..4b15286753ba 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct bench_res {
>         long hits;
>         long drops;
>         long false_hits;
> +       long important_hits;
>  };
>
>  struct bench {
> @@ -61,6 +62,9 @@ void false_hits_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res, long delta_ns);
>  void false_hits_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt);
>  void ops_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res, long delta_ns);
>  void ops_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt);
> +void local_storage_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res,
> +                                  long delta_ns);
> +void local_storage_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt);
>
>  static inline __u64 get_time_ns(void)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_local_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_local_storage.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9a3fd5295db1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_local_storage.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> +
> +#include <argp.h>
> +#include <linux/btf.h>
> +
> +#include "local_storage_bench.skel.h"
> +#include "bench.h"
> +
> +#include <test_btf.h>
> +
> +static struct {
> +       __u32 nr_maps;
> +       __u32 hashmap_nr_keys_used;
> +} args = {
> +       .nr_maps = 1000,
> +       .hashmap_nr_keys_used = 1000,
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> +       ARG_NR_MAPS = 6000,
> +       ARG_HASHMAP_NR_KEYS_USED = 6001,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct argp_option opts[] = {
> +       { "nr_maps", ARG_NR_MAPS, "NR_MAPS", 0,
> +               "Set number of local_storage maps"},
> +       { "hashmap_nr_keys_used", ARG_HASHMAP_NR_KEYS_USED, "NR_KEYS",
> +               0, "When doing hashmap test, set number of hashmap keys test uses"},
> +       {},
> +};
> +
> +static error_t parse_arg(int key, char *arg, struct argp_state *state)
> +{
> +       long ret;
> +
> +       switch (key) {
> +       case ARG_NR_MAPS:
> +               ret = strtol(arg, NULL, 10);
> +               if (ret < 1 || ret > UINT_MAX) {
> +                       fprintf(stderr, "invalid nr_maps");
> +                       argp_usage(state);
> +               }
> +               args.nr_maps = ret;
> +               break;
> +       case ARG_HASHMAP_NR_KEYS_USED:
> +               ret = strtol(arg, NULL, 10);
> +               if (ret < 1 || ret > UINT_MAX) {
> +                       fprintf(stderr, "invalid hashmap_nr_keys_used");
> +                       argp_usage(state);
> +               }
> +               args.hashmap_nr_keys_used = ret;
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               return ARGP_ERR_UNKNOWN;
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +const struct argp bench_local_storage_argp = {
> +       .options = opts,
> +       .parser = parse_arg,
> +};
> +
> +/* Keep in sync w/ array of maps in bpf */
> +#define MAX_NR_MAPS 1000
> +/* keep in sync w/ same define in bpf */
> +#define HASHMAP_SZ 4194304
> +
> +static void validate(void)
> +{
> +       if (env.producer_cnt != 1) {
> +               fprintf(stderr, "benchmark doesn't support multi-producer!\n");
> +               exit(1);
> +       }
> +       if (env.consumer_cnt != 1) {
> +               fprintf(stderr, "benchmark doesn't support multi-consumer!\n");
> +               exit(1);
> +       }
> +
> +       if (args.nr_maps > MAX_NR_MAPS) {
> +               fprintf(stderr, "nr_maps must be <= 1000\n");
> +               exit(1);
> +       }
> +
> +       if (args.hashmap_nr_keys_used > HASHMAP_SZ) {
> +               fprintf(stderr, "hashmap_nr_keys_used must be <= %u\n", HASHMAP_SZ);
> +               exit(1);
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static struct {
> +       struct local_storage_bench *skel;
> +       void *bpf_obj;
> +       struct bpf_map *array_of_maps;
> +} ctx;
> +
> +static void __setup(struct bpf_program *prog, bool hashmap)
> +{
> +       struct bpf_map *inner_map;
> +       int i, fd, mim_fd, err;
> +
> +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, create_opts);
> +
> +       if (!hashmap)
> +               create_opts.map_flags = BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC;
> +
> +       ctx.skel->rodata->num_maps = args.nr_maps;
> +       ctx.skel->rodata->hashmap_num_keys = args.hashmap_nr_keys_used;
> +       inner_map = bpf_map__inner_map(ctx.array_of_maps);
> +       create_opts.btf_key_type_id = bpf_map__btf_key_type_id(inner_map);
> +       create_opts.btf_value_type_id = bpf_map__btf_value_type_id(inner_map);
> +
> +       err = local_storage_bench__load(ctx.skel);
> +       if (err) {
> +               fprintf(stderr, "Error loading skeleton\n");
> +               goto err_out;
> +       }
> +
> +       create_opts.btf_fd = bpf_object__btf_fd(ctx.skel->obj);
> +
> +       mim_fd = bpf_map__fd(ctx.array_of_maps);
> +       if (mim_fd < 0) {
> +               fprintf(stderr, "Error getting map_in_map fd\n");
> +               goto err_out;
> +       }
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < args.nr_maps; i++) {
> +               if (hashmap)
> +                       fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, NULL, sizeof(int),
> +                                           sizeof(int), HASHMAP_SZ, &create_opts);
> +               else
> +                       fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_TASK_STORAGE, NULL, sizeof(int),
> +                                           sizeof(int), 0, &create_opts);
> +               if (fd < 0) {
> +                       fprintf(stderr, "Error creating map %d: %d\n", i, fd);
> +                       goto err_out;
> +               }
> +
> +               err = bpf_map_update_elem(mim_fd, &i, &fd, 0);
> +               if (err) {
> +                       fprintf(stderr, "Error updating array-of-maps w/ map %d\n", i);
> +                       goto err_out;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       if (!bpf_program__attach(prog)) {
> +               fprintf(stderr, "Error attaching bpf program\n");
> +               goto err_out;
> +       }
> +
> +       return;
> +err_out:
> +       exit(1);
> +}
> +
> +static void hashmap_setup(void)
> +{
> +       struct local_storage_bench *skel;
> +
> +       setup_libbpf();
> +
> +       skel = local_storage_bench__open();
> +       ctx.skel = skel;
> +       ctx.array_of_maps = skel->maps.array_of_hash_maps;
> +       skel->rodata->use_hashmap = 1;
> +       skel->rodata->interleave = 0;
> +
> +       __setup(skel->progs.get_local, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void local_storage_cache_get_setup(void)
> +{
> +       struct local_storage_bench *skel;
> +
> +       setup_libbpf();
> +
> +       skel = local_storage_bench__open();
> +       ctx.skel = skel;
> +       ctx.array_of_maps = skel->maps.array_of_local_storage_maps;
> +       skel->rodata->use_hashmap = 0;
> +       skel->rodata->interleave = 0;
> +
> +       __setup(skel->progs.get_local, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void local_storage_cache_get_interleaved_setup(void)
> +{
> +       struct local_storage_bench *skel;
> +
> +       setup_libbpf();
> +
> +       skel = local_storage_bench__open();
> +       ctx.skel = skel;
> +       ctx.array_of_maps = skel->maps.array_of_local_storage_maps;
> +       skel->rodata->use_hashmap = 0;
> +       skel->rodata->interleave = 1;
> +
> +       __setup(skel->progs.get_local, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void measure(struct bench_res *res)
> +{
> +       res->hits = atomic_swap(&ctx.skel->bss->hits, 0);
> +       res->important_hits = atomic_swap(&ctx.skel->bss->important_hits, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void trigger_bpf_program(void)
> +{
> +       syscall(__NR_getpgid);
> +}
> +
> +static void *consumer(void *input)
> +{
> +       return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void *producer(void *input)
> +{
> +       while (true)
> +               trigger_bpf_program();
> +
> +       return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/* cache sequential and interleaved get benchs test local_storage get
> + * performance, specifically they demonstrate performance cliff of
> + * current list-plus-cache local_storage model.
> + *
> + * cache sequential get: call bpf_task_storage_get on n maps in order
> + * cache interleaved get: like "sequential get", but interleave 4 calls to the
> + *     'important' map (idx 0 in array_of_maps) for every 10 calls. Goal
> + *     is to mimic environment where many progs are accessing their local_storage
> + *     maps, with 'our' prog needing to access its map more often than others
> + */
> +const struct bench bench_local_storage_cache_seq_get = {
> +       .name = "local-storage-cache-seq-get",
> +       .validate = validate,
> +       .setup = local_storage_cache_get_setup,
> +       .producer_thread = producer,
> +       .consumer_thread = consumer,
> +       .measure = measure,
> +       .report_progress = local_storage_report_progress,
> +       .report_final = local_storage_report_final,
> +};
> +
> +const struct bench bench_local_storage_cache_interleaved_get = {
> +       .name = "local-storage-cache-int-get",
> +       .validate = validate,
> +       .setup = local_storage_cache_get_interleaved_setup,
> +       .producer_thread = producer,
> +       .consumer_thread = consumer,
> +       .measure = measure,
> +       .report_progress = local_storage_report_progress,
> +       .report_final = local_storage_report_final,
> +};
> +
> +const struct bench bench_local_storage_cache_hashmap_control = {
> +       .name = "local-storage-cache-hashmap-control",
> +       .validate = validate,
> +       .setup = hashmap_setup,
> +       .producer_thread = producer,
> +       .consumer_thread = consumer,
> +       .measure = measure,
> +       .report_progress = local_storage_report_progress,
> +       .report_final = local_storage_report_final,
> +};
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_local_storage.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_local_storage.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..2eb2b513a173
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_local_storage.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +source ./benchs/run_common.sh
> +
> +set -eufo pipefail
> +
> +header "Hashmap Control"
> +for i in 10 1000 10000 100000 4194304; do
> +subtitle "num keys: $i"
> +       summarize_local_storage "hashmap (control) sequential    get: "\
> +               "$(./bench --nr_maps 1 --hashmap_nr_keys_used=$i local-storage-cache-hashmap-control)"
> +       printf "\n"
> +done
> +
> +header "Local Storage"
> +for i in 1 10 16 17 24 32 100 1000; do
> +subtitle "num_maps: $i"
> +       summarize_local_storage "local_storage cache sequential  get: "\
> +               "$(./bench --nr_maps $i local-storage-cache-seq-get)"
> +       summarize_local_storage "local_storage cache interleaved get: "\
> +               "$(./bench --nr_maps $i local-storage-cache-int-get)"
> +       printf "\n"
> +done
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_common.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_common.sh
> index 6c5e6023a69f..d9f40af82006 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_common.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_common.sh
> @@ -41,6 +41,16 @@ function ops()
>         echo "$*" | sed -E "s/.*latency\s+([0-9]+\.[0-9]+\sns\/op).*/\1/"
>  }
>
> +function local_storage()
> +{
> +       echo -n "hits throughput: "
> +       echo -n "$*" | sed -E "s/.* hits throughput\s+([0-9]+\.[0-9]+ ± [0-9]+\.[0-9]+\sM\sops\/s).*/\1/"
> +       echo -n -e ", hits latency: "
> +       echo -n "$*" | sed -E "s/.* hits latency\s+([0-9]+\.[0-9]+\sns\/op).*/\1/"
> +       echo -n ", important_hits throughput: "
> +       echo "$*" | sed -E "s/.*important_hits throughput\s+([0-9]+\.[0-9]+ ± [0-9]+\.[0-9]+\sM\sops\/s).*/\1/"
> +}
> +
>  function total()
>  {
>         echo "$*" | sed -E "s/.*total operations\s+([0-9]+\.[0-9]+ ± [0-9]+\.[0-9]+M\/s).*/\1/"
> @@ -67,6 +77,13 @@ function summarize_ops()
>         printf "%-20s %s\n" "$bench" "$(ops $summary)"
>  }
>
> +function summarize_local_storage()
> +{
> +       bench="$1"
> +       summary=$(echo $2 | tail -n1)
> +       printf "%-20s %s\n" "$bench" "$(local_storage $summary)"
> +}
> +
>  function summarize_total()
>  {
>         bench="$1"
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage_bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage_bench.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2c3234c5b73a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage_bench.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include "bpf_misc.h"
> +
> +#define HASHMAP_SZ 4194304
> +
> +struct {
> +       __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS);
> +       __uint(max_entries, 1000);
> +       __type(key, int);
> +       __type(value, int);
> +       __array(values, struct {
> +               __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_TASK_STORAGE);
> +               __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
> +               __type(key, int);
> +               __type(value, int);
> +       });
> +} array_of_local_storage_maps SEC(".maps");
> +
> +struct {
> +       __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS);
> +       __uint(max_entries, 1000);
> +       __type(key, int);
> +       __type(value, int);
> +       __array(values, struct {
> +               __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
> +               __uint(max_entries, HASHMAP_SZ);
> +               __type(key, int);
> +               __type(value, int);
> +       });
> +} array_of_hash_maps SEC(".maps");
> +
> +long important_hits;
> +long hits;
> +
> +/* set from user-space */
> +const volatile unsigned int use_hashmap;
> +const volatile unsigned int hashmap_num_keys;
> +const volatile unsigned int num_maps;
> +const volatile unsigned int interleave;
> +
> +struct loop_ctx {
> +       struct task_struct *task;
> +       long loop_hits;
> +       long loop_important_hits;
> +};
> +
> +static int do_lookup(unsigned int elem, struct loop_ctx *lctx)
> +{
> +       void *map, *inner_map;
> +       int idx = 0;
> +
> +       if (use_hashmap)
> +               map = &array_of_hash_maps;
> +       else
> +               map = &array_of_local_storage_maps;
> +
> +       inner_map = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &elem);
> +       if (!inner_map)
> +               return -1;
> +
> +       if (use_hashmap) {
> +               idx = bpf_get_prandom_u32() % hashmap_num_keys;
> +               bpf_map_lookup_elem(inner_map, &idx);
> +       } else {
> +               bpf_task_storage_get(inner_map, lctx->task, &idx,
> +                                    BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
> +       }
> +
> +       lctx->loop_hits++;
> +       if (!elem)
> +               lctx->loop_important_hits++;
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long loop(u32 index, void *ctx)
> +{
> +       struct loop_ctx *lctx = (struct loop_ctx *)ctx;
> +       unsigned int map_idx = index % num_maps;
> +
> +       do_lookup(map_idx, lctx);
> +       if (interleave && map_idx % 3 == 0)
> +               do_lookup(0, lctx);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
> +int get_local(void *ctx)
> +{
> +       struct loop_ctx lctx;
> +
> +       lctx.task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
> +       lctx.loop_hits = 0;
> +       lctx.loop_important_hits = 0;
> +       bpf_loop(10000, &loop, &lctx, 0);
> +       __sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, lctx.loop_hits);
> +       __sync_add_and_fetch(&important_hits, lctx.loop_important_hits);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 2.30.2
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-22 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-04 22:20 [PATCH v5 bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Add benchmark for local_storage get Dave Marchevsky
2022-06-08 23:02 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-06-09 14:27   ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-06-09 15:49     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-06-20 19:49       ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-06-22 23:00 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2022-06-24 20:22   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-06-24 21:25     ` Yosry Ahmed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJD7tkYkhg2RQWJi72Eu0UOAqLGAPYm21TxQvCVC4R74TK0vqg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yosryahmed@google.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.